|
|
|
It's interesting that Kristof started off by attacking the idea that on Judgement Day one's religious beliefs will matter, but then got diverted on to the "how stupid to try to predict the date of the second coming" and "they must be greedy profiteers" angles. |
|
I have observed that those who believe in "truth" (even if they are wrong about what truth is), are more open-minded than those who don't. As a Catholic who believes in Truth, I'm willing to listen to other arguments because I want to follow the truth. The way I see it, the worst that could happen is that I change my mind. But for a relativist, nothing is true. So they don't even have to consider a contrary argument. What would be the point? |
|
It is a little bit rich for a liberal like Nick Kristof to judge others based on whether they have been right in the past. |
|
I think the really interesting thing about this article is the trend it discloses in "values" coverage after the election. The lib. meadia outlets are all supposedly a buzz over this new discovery they've made--that people actually act on the beliefs they claim to hold. |
|
I can sympathize with Kristof's discomfort with the LB take on non-protestants. Doesn't the quote on the coming everlasting torment of these "heretics" betray a certain, well...GLEE at their fate despite the authors objection that it's all right there in the Bible? Is this what evangelical Christianity has come too? I imagine that Kristof, although he didn't actually articulate this view, was concerned about what this deft bit of malicious indirection says about the civic virtue (i.e. the willingness to respect all other citizens) of the LB fan base. |
|
So Kristof is still at it? His op-ed piece mocking Catholic reverence for the Blessed Virgin was the precipitating reason I no longer read the paper. |
Commenting by HaloScan |