|
|
|
hah! very good
hoot |
05.14.05 - 8:04 am | #
|
|
Great post!
Anita Job |
Homepage |
05.14.05 - 1:43 pm | #
|
|
But, in a larger sense, what a terrific post you have here.
Chris |
Homepage |
05.14.05 - 6:05 pm | #
|
|
Who cares about the issues. It's all about the "quality" of the post 
Anita Job |
Homepage |
05.14.05 - 6:13 pm | #
|
|
great post.
Ask not what casino owners can do for your state, ask what your state can do for casino owners.
Matt |
Homepage |
05.17.05 - 12:33 pm | #
|
|
Honestly, I'm not entirely opposed to casinos, nor am I inherently opposed to casinos located near existent tourist areas even if they are areas of historical importance. I wonder whether a.) the money could be better spent: today's election asked whether we should borrow money to clean up environmental damage; and b.) whether some safeguards could be imposed to avoid some of the negative side-effects of casinos close to historically valuable places.
heinrich |
Homepage |
05.17.05 - 4:10 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|