i listened to your presentation today and i thought that there was too little information...
but i also was shocked how few people knew blogs. strange..
Sorry to hear that you were disappointed, but we had to pitch it for the audience we expected. Also I'd rather have people listening to little information and point them to further information instead of loosing them through information overload.
i understand what you want to say, but in my opinion you seemed as if you didnīt care about the presentation too much. it felt so "la la, we just tell them some facts and then say words like "power" etc..." i just think that you also could have a little more explanation for the people who donīt have that much of a clue concerning this subject.
Thanks for posting - it explains a bit better all those parallels to my own thinking that I find in your weblog.
Some thoughts that could be useful (from reading other posts as well):
- You may want to look at/document your weblog reading habits as well. [tried 3 versions of sentences] I can't explain it well, but reading is important (some insights in http://blog.mathemagenic.com/200.../25.html#a1321)
- "Structure of the community" - it's changing while you are trying to understand it - any ideas how are you are going to account for it?
- Online vs. offline - in _my_ blogging community (whatever it is 
online turns into offline pretry often and quite fast. Unless you want to stay on the fringe.
[I guess I'm pretty bad in commenting. At least it feels so ]
you're very good at it, you just don't know!
Commenting by HaloScan
