|
|
|
I enjoyed your comment very much. YES! All our God requires of us is faith. That is where Judeo-Christianity is different from all other religions. Trying to persuade those I love to grasp this truth has not been possible for me yet. Perhaps your comments will be the right words for them to see the light. aggieb |
|
So, according to you, all I have to do is take my life and then I will FINALLY be able to sit at the Lords feet instead of having to endure the sins of this world? |
|
A4given1: |
|
Loraine Boettner once pointed out that for an Arminian, Catholic or other hemi-demi-semi-Pelagian, who believe it's possible for a once-saved person to later lose their salvation, the most rational thing to do would be to kill yourself as soon as you had been baptised (either paedo- or credo-). And the greatest act of mercy would be to kill someone currently in a state of grace. The certain loss of your earthly life would be nothing compared to removing the risk that, by some post-justification sin, you could later forfeit your salvation and send yourself to hell. Whereas to a Reformed Christian, suicide is not a mortal sin but is merely pointless: you gain nothing, but lose the chance to go on to do good works through the rest of your life. A suicide is a sad waste, to be pitied but not condemned. |
|
For the record: "We should not despari of the eternal salvation of person who have taken their own lives. By ways known to him alone, God can provide the opportunity for salutary repentence. The Church prays for persons who have taken their own lives." Catechism of the Catholic Church 2283. |
|
My problem with this argument is my problem with reformed theology in general, namely the defination of faith. James set it out nicely: it is a belief that results in works. Faith without works is dead is worthless to save anyone. Faith and works can be differentiated, but never seperated. They are complimentary halves of the same coin. |
|
James, I'm not sure why that should be a problem with Reformed theology? It's not Reformed Christians who say, "Yep, X had genuine faith all right, but he lacked sufficient works, so he ended up in hell". |
|
Yes, but Reformed thinkers too often define faith as a mere head knowledge, an agreement with certain theological truths apart from any behavioral evidence of its reality. Can it be said that a suicide has a true faith? We all sin, and every instance is an act of disbelief. The only beliefs that matter are those that are conveyed and quickened by our actions and attitudes. Correct theology is not what God asks of us. |
|
James, I agree that biblical faith is indeed one which expresses itself in our behavior. But if true beleivers still have times in their life when they do sin (even if rare), is it not possible that a suicide could be one such instance? |
|
I'm not really arguing with your main point. As a not-Catholic, I don't believe that a suicide is a one-way ticket hell. However, I dispute the Protestant view of salvation as a single event that happens at the beginning of the Christian life, rather than as its culmination. Suicide is an act of disbelief, perhaps the gravest example of such, and thus is capable of calling a person's faith into question. I don't presume to box God in in such cases, He saves who He will, and only He knows the hearts and minds. I just think it is equally wrong to say the person who had a salvific experience at some point is immune from hell, even if he falls into sin and/or suicide as it is to say that suicide nullifies every good thing that went before it and renders a person unfit for heaven. |
|
I am really surprised at this conversation. |
Commenting by HaloScan |