We are pleased to announce the launch of 'YuppMarks'. Yuppmarks.com is a Social bookmarking website which opens the door to new ways of bookmarking, managing and mingles your categorized resources.
A Social Bookmark Website. Anyone can participate and free traffic to your website or blog.
Start your bookmarking information and Share it with the world through Yuppmarks.com
To start just logon to http://www.yuppmarks.com/
Obama's entire agenda section, from Civil Rights to Additional Issues, disapeared, not just Urban Policy. He also edited the wording on his America Serves page.
See:
http://obamaservation.wikidot.co....com/change-
gov
This terrifying secret plan has been posted on Obama's campaign site for months, where it still remains:
http://origin.barackobama.com/is...law-
enforcement
Julian - over/under on how long it stays there?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_...0093042-
38.html
Agendas vanish from Obama's transition Web site
17 hours, 21 minutes ago
Last week, President-elect Barack Obama launched a Web site detailing his plans for tech, Iraq, and health care. Now those plans are gone, and the campaign isn't saying why.
(Posted in Politics and Law by Declan McCullagh)
There are unverified caches of the Agenda sections at these links:
http://www.mega.nu/ampp/obama_ag...nda/
agenda.html
http://www.kvinet.com/~mack/
Note that there's still a mention of mandatory service in a PDF available on his campaign site:
http://24ahead.com/blog/archives...ves/
008330.html
It's good to see that everyone is getting around to actually reading BHO's site, and perhaps they could consider turning some attention to these:
my.barackobama.com/page/content/kidshome
my.barackobama.com/page/content/eahome
'Supporting it is an insider DC tip that his people are seriously considering a federal ban or restriction on "right to carry" laws.'
I could not find any actual news article that made this assertion about the DC insider (unless David Hardy is asserting he was tipped by said insider himself?)
This is obviously different than restricting assault weapons, and I am concerned that people are being led to conflate the two. I have found numerous websites repeating this 'right to carry' allegation, but as far as I can tell there is no actual "source" for this allegation.
Even evidence from Obama's past positions on gun control do not support this belief well. In 1996 he responded to a targeted survey saying he supported a ban on handguns, but later denied that it was his writing on the document and said that he did not support that position.
So as far as I can tell, there is no *reliable* reason to believe Obama would ban concealed weapons. Unless of course you believe Obama is freely duplicitous, in which case you will be able to convince yourself of anything, evidence or not.
If he's planning on taking our right to own "Assault Weapons" for protection or sport, then they need to take the right for his Secret Service agents to carry them as well. If he feels banning these weapons will make our streets safer, then he needs to back that up by arming his security detail with nerf guns. It sounds to me that it's ok for us not to protect ourselves but it's not ok for his family not to be protected.
Still there, different page. So it is in 2 locations now.
http://change.gov/agenda/urbanpo...npolicy_agenda/
Commenting by HaloScan
