|
|
|
Dude... Calvin Klein pro-line or pro-stretch trunks/boxer-breifs/breifs or what have you. They last FOREVER, and give a comfy, but not excessive, amount of support. And the chicks dig 'em.
dave |
07.29.05 - 10:59 am | #
|
|
Readers of my blog may or may not know about my general anti-boxer-brief position, but it may be worth reiterating in a later post. Nevertheless, I can't get behind boxer briefs, man.
Jon |
Homepage |
07.29.05 - 1:20 pm | #
|
|
You could come over to my place and do your laundry. Everyone else is. I think the entire Chicago improv community has done their laundry here. And the laundry machines are accessed through my room.
dennis |
Homepage |
07.29.05 - 7:24 pm | #
|
|
Dude, that was an anticlimactic ending. I demand more excitement!
edge walker |
Homepage |
07.30.05 - 4:54 pm | #
|
|
It's always good to have depth on your boxer bench; perhaps you could try to trade your spare unmatched socks for additional backup boxers at the trade deadline.
Dev |
Homepage |
08.01.05 - 10:40 am | #
|
|
8 out of 10 ladies prefer boxers or boxer-briefs to briefs.
KJB |
Homepage |
08.01.05 - 12:09 pm | #
|
|
woah jon! I just read your recount of last year's SD con and derek kirk kim came and partied with you?? He's one of the greatest guys!
I am also faced with the laundry dillema where the only pants I have to wear are the ones my friend left in my laundry basket.
Felicia |
08.01.05 - 11:43 pm | #
|
|
As a chick, I feel it is my duty to inform dave that I do not, in fact, dig boxer briefs. They look creepy. That is all.
Ashley |
08.05.05 - 1:48 pm | #
|
|
in defense of boxer-breifs, breifs, trunks, and all the other fine supportive male undergarments -- so much depends on the style, and so much depends on who is wearing em. Fruit of the Loom or Hanes will never get anyone laid. Calvin Klein, RIPS, and 2xist seem to work well though. Having an ass and/or impressive package helps.
dave |
08.07.05 - 1:56 pm | #
|
|
...Again, as the female audience of Jon's illustrious blog, I shall submit my retort:
I do not, as such, make it a point to stare at men's bums. (In case you've forgotten, poop comes out of there.) Nor do I stare at their packages. It's just not a thing that I find too impressive, really.
I suppose what I'm trying to say here is this: if you really want to attract a person with no personality who has (likely) no interest in anything more than your physical attributes, than boxer briefs, and indeed any other kind of male protection-type undergarment, are the thing for you.
Personally I'll stick with guys in proper boxers.
That is all.
Ashley |
08.08.05 - 7:18 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|