We can solve the "drilling or oil wherever we find it" problem, the immigration problem, the guest worker problem and half our social problems, not by annexing Mexico, but by begging them to annex us. They're already on the way to doing so. They'd not tolerate the antisocial behavior that we do...They'd have no problem drilling in Alaska, or jailing bad people. The only problem is that their govt. is corrupt, but we're moving in that direction, too. So what's the big deal? Please, Mexico, take us in...I want to be your illegal immigrant.


I think we should use some of the money we used to send to the hopeless Palestinians. Mexicans can use it more productively. We can set up an office down there to facilitate branches of American businesses that employ Mexican nationals -- and, give any illegal in our country priority status to get a job there--in fact, the our government could pay their way back to take the jobs our companies have created.


Do you want to provoke Hugo Chavez to helpless nightmares? He knows America want to invade Venezuela (not), but taking Mexico in..! You would hear the Marxist primal scream from every fibre of his puny racist body.


Does not sound like a bad idea at first blush. It has a number of positives that lend itself to it. I would have to give this some real thought though. The first being how many present Mexicans would like to become Americans. What would be the costs of bringing large numbers out of poverty? There are a number of questions that need to be answered, but I kind of like it though there are a number of factors that seem to make it improbale.
My only real problem with immigration as it is now is ensuring legal immigration.


There's a competing movement for "The 51st State" designation in Taiwan. [http://members.aol.com/xpus/FSM-Appeal.html]


there's another in Kurdistan, too, a "51st State " movement


Alan Moore, in WATCHMEN, imagines an alternate reality in which the U.S. won the Vietnam War in 1971, making VN the 51st state by 1985.

And personally, I don't see why we don't just grant full statehood to Puerto Rico after so long.


We could call it the United States of America and Mexico--the USAM


Dr. Sanity,

You might like to read this, from City Journal.

http://www.city-journal.org/html...06-04- 10hm.html

Do you know what Mexican authorities do with foreigners who protest their policies? Those foreigners are kicked out of the country, on the spot.

Hmmm...


Puerto Rico doesn't want statehood. They just want all the benefits of statehood (which they have).
We realy should make them take an "in or out" vote, and either make them a state or seperate country.

And to be honest, given the current 50/50 political split, you need to let 2 states in of equal political size. One Dem, one Rep.

So, Puerto Rice could come in (Dem), if Alberta (Rep) gets in too (assuming they're political equal but opposite).


Mexico still has hundreds of miles of beautiful untapped beaches.I can see thousands and thousands of beautiful high rise condo's in our 51st state. Many more $$$$$$ for our economy......


No, according to La Raza, California belongs to Mexico, don't you know?

I mean, if Israel belongs to the Palestinians, who never had a country, really, then clearly, Cali, which used to belong to Mexico for a short time, MUST belong to Mexico again!!!

Screw the last 150 years!


> you need to let 2 states in of equal political size. One Dem, one Rep.

...One slave, one free?

Mentally


Damn, the Annex Mexico train is picking up steam. Let's go all the way to the Panama Canal. That border would be much easier to secure than the current one.


James Lileks mentioned this on Hugh Hewitt's radio show a few days ago.

I personally wouldn't mind if we gave California to Mexico, as long as my relatives were able to get out before the housing market crashed.


Name:

Email:

URL:

Comment:  ?

Commenting by HaloScan.com