Make the Democratic party into a nagging wife like picture. Take the Republicans as the husband who is married to this bitching idiot. Now just think about this for a while.

Is it no wonder that Hillary is driving for the leader of this party?

As to the man who wants to play her husband...ask Bill who he thinks should be her target?

If you could get his answer, and it was in fact a truthful answer...wouldn't you know more about this family dynamic and add just a few more pieces of our puzzle? Read Camille Paglia's latest for more info.

Here's the battle of my narcissistic generation forming up! The boomers and free lovers of doin' your own thing are about ready to reap what they have sown.

Problem is our kids have to clean up this mess! Oh well, as narcissists we really don't care; after all, they should be grateful we gave them life!


Unfortunately the left does not realize that undermining the perception of US solidarity abroad, makes the threat of military force less credible, and the use of military force more necessary.


Are you really unable to understand what is happening? The degenerate Western civilization, based as it is on man-made laws, is in its death throes. Most Western "leaders", and many common people have accepted that the future belongs to Islam. Allah's (swt) law (Sharia) will soon be fully implemented in Europe; it is at least partially implemented in Canada and is making significant inroads in the United States.

Almost all Westerners realise that further resistance is futile and that their real purpose in this life is to please Allah, who created them for that purpose. It is time for all of humanity to bow towards Mecca and praise Allah (swt).

Embrace Islam now, before it is too late for you. Let us all live in peace in submission to the will of Almighty Allah (swt).

Your grandchildren will be Muslim.

Allahu akbar!


What's disturbing (and I have not read the entire report) is that nuclear preemption is apparently not reserved for actual WMD threat. The use of nuclear force should be reserved to prevent the launch or release of the weapon, although it doesn't require that the launch or release be imminent or announced.

But the big problem with NATO is that the smaller partners are not pulling their own weight in conventional forces, greatly increasing the likelyhood that we will be forced back to the use of nuclear weapons. If you read StrategyPage.com you know that most countries in NATO rely not only on American logistics but on American combat airpower. They can't support their troops on the ground, which is becoming a major problem in Afghanistan. Nor is it clear that their troops are ready for the kind of warfare that American soldiers are seeing daily. They aren't a hollow force, nor are they paradeground soldiers. But they did not clear Fallujah, nor have most of them been clearing IEDs daily.


A further comment on the Belmont Club analysis: The danger of a rogue state like North Korea increases if it can set up shop in a failed state somewhere (like Sudan). A secret lab buried under a warehouse or garage on the edge of a city might go undetected so long as the movement of materials and people could be camouflaged. If the people live in the complex, this becomes much easier.

It's probably doable, and I suspect that our intelligence agencies have daily nightmares about it.


From Wretcher: the West may now be left with threatening global catastrophe to preserve itself.

The West is ONLY worth preserving if the left is in power. Otherwise, they'd do anything, even at the expense of catastrophe(s), to achieve that end.

Once they are in control, first priority is to maintain the iron grip on their control, second step is eliminate any outside threat (or suspected outside threat) with pre-emptive strike. As long as they can be sure only the general public and the fools in military will suffer, while they are tucked in safe bunkers.


My grandchildren are off KILLING Muslim assholes like you. How does that make you feel, Moon Worshipper?


"When citizens consider citizenship to be nothing more than a vehicle for the enjoyment of rights, with duties left to others, then the military is left on the fringes. This has consequences both for
the quality of the armed forces and for the respect afforded to them." p. 37

The quote above is from the report Wretchard discusses. I read the section entitled "Loss of the Rational," which begins on page 38. Here are a couple of quotes from that section. They complement the analyses that Dr. Sanity has provided in the past.

Towards a Grand Strategy for an Uncertain World by NATO Military Specialists
http://www.worldsecuritynetwork....andStrat(b) .pdf

The loss of the rational in Western societies can be identified as part of a larger cultural trend that makes such societies more vulnerable, and it has many symptoms ranging from the innocuous to the fanatical. The cult of celebrity, focused on
pop artists and athletes, is a more innocent symptom of this wider cultural phenomenon. In some Western societies, faith in purely irrational belief systems has overtaken belief in religions that have moral and rational substance, as well as cultural roots. But symptoms such as the decline of interest in science reflect an intellectual decline that might have more
immediately palpable social consequences in areas such as journalism, law, and even public health. It reflects a more general loss of respect for the value of evidence and argument. As a direct consequence of the globalisation of information flows, all kinds of irrational belief or political fanaticism circulate freely in the public domain. Traits of the open society, such as freedom of speech, can then be used against themselves and against other liberties. [just think about Ezra Levant & the current cartoon controversy in Canada--my note] P. 39

And here's a tremendous insight from p. 40 of the report:

"Notwithstanding the common perception in the
West, the origin of Islamist terrorism is not victimhood, nor an inferiority complex, but a well-financed superiority complex grounded in a violent political ideology."


Not to diminish the analysis/conclusions presented in the NATO report, but consider the following: what if the apocalyptic scenario is overblown, simply because we refuse to acknowledge the reality of the threat which multiculturalism poses to our society? The other side has no need of WMDs if it can merely move in and change things from the inside without the mess.

Meanwhile, we spend our all our time searching caves in Pakistan for radiation signatures, only to wake up and find ourselves dhimmified by our continued refusal to support the proposition that our Western values are not only better, but the best value set Mankind has ever seen.

See, e.g. Ezra Levant and Mark Steyn. Our American Muslim, above.

Cheers.


No other recent political development has underlined the destructive effects of the Left's opposition to the War on Terror as much as this manifesto. To now stake the safety of the West upon pre-emptive nuclear attack....
Wretchard

Faux Liberal Progressivism - hey, it's not just mere thought chaos anymore! It's a Death Cult.


It's going to get worse, unless we can agree on a GOP nominee:

"Conservatives Must Back McCain":

http://americanpowerblog.blogspo...ack- mccain.html


Nuclear weapons give us a false sense of security. Especially when the enemy is spread out in 100 countries and most major universities.


I'm sorry, I know we should just ignore AM and his idiotic drivel. However --

Yes, AM -- the west doesn't imprison its women, shutter the minds of its young in endless repetition of seventh century hate rants or mutilate little girls. (There are individuals who do all that, but the culture punishes and disapproves of them.) Our religious institutions do not issue rules on what level of sexual abuse of infants is good and holy. And those of us who believe expect something more from paradise than an endless debauch. We expect a transcendent reward your stunted mind seems incapable of understanding. And we don't expect it from killing other humans, infidels or not. Killing might be needed, but it's not ordered by our G-d. We'll do it if forced to, but we'll regret doing it, and we'll atone after it.

If this seems like decadence to your evil-blinded vision, so be it. If that seems like weakness to you, it just shows the extent of your inability to understand.

You know and I know, and everyone on this Earth knows that you can't win. We know and you know, you're handicapped, a blind thing crawling through a universe you can't grasp, that you refuse to learn, that you refuse to grow up. Your sad theocracy couldn't even FEED the world's population and only death is in the giving of your masters.

You can hurt us, you can upset us, you can make us uncomfortable, but the only question is how long before we lose patience and defeat our scruples. How long before your own children lose patience with you.

Thanks to Western Culture making the world freer and more prosperous than ever, your grandchildren, religious or not, will be free. And that's what makes you boil in your own bile and come here to taunt free men with your nonsense. Because you can't even IMAGINE that freedom, and what you glimpse of it scares you senseless.

Rant on and enjoy it. We've held our hand back because we feel SORRY for you. But one more step over the line and the feeling will pass.

Let me quote a "decadent" writer at you, a man who lived more and thought deeper than you slaves can dream of.

I've long maintained that Robert A. Heinlein's The Puppet Masters is the metaphor for this war. Pay heed to its last lines:

"I feel exhilarated. Puppet masters -- the free men are coming to kill you!"

Your grandchildren WILL be free.

P.


AM...american muslim...no such thing. He could be more aptly called Allah's Mutant.

In today's post he morphs from his usual Islamic Rage Boy persona to patronizing used car salesman.

This may be an indication of a new approach, perhaps suggested by one of the others on the commitee that writes his ummm...posts.

"HE" is a gang of boys at the mosque, laughing histerically every time they call a store and ask if they have Prince Albert in a can, or post muslim threats on Dr. Sanity.

Anyway, we see in their words that they have no conception of what it means to be American.


Portia,

You got everything right except the fact that most, if not all, LLL think there is no danger. They hate us more than they fear the Islamofascists. Until they get it, we are not going to have much success in eradicating this cancer, I fear.


"their real purpose in this life is to please Allah"

I will see Allah in hell and pee in his face before I would consider pleasing him or any of his minions on earth. After which, I would consider it an honor to roast one of his 72 concubine goats for lunch and share it with the devil.

Alas, none of this can happen. Allah, hell, and the devil do not exist. They are a psychological and intellectual cancer that should be abolished from the earth because they are an insult to all that is good.


ARH, you had me up until your rant.
Was it Baudelaire who said that the Devil's greatest trick was in convincing us that he does not (nor, by extension, God) exist?
Enough, already.


As Wretchard says, the presence of this kind of philosophical digression in what is ostensibly a strategy paper is disturbing because they seem to feel the need for such esoteric analysis. So far away from the practicalities of defence and military strategy have the intellectual elites wandered into their self absorbed worlds that these pragmatic men are forced to go back to basic principles to wake them up and reconnect them with reality. It's like trying to explain quantum physics to a grade schooler. I can just see them, when being given serious, considered strategic advice by sober patriots, their eyes rolling back in their heads and droning a Mr Mackie like "War is baad, M'kay?"


> Your grandchildren will be Muslim.

My grandchildren will kill Muslims attempting to force them to convert. That is about as close to Islam as they will get.


Name:

Email:

URL:

Comment:  ?

Commenting by HaloScan.com