The Ebolaworld Happy Fun Blog Comment Post Page
sam, i guess i beat ya to this
al qaeda says zawahiri letter is a U.S fabrication. read it. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/
20051...qaeda_letter_dc
also, i h8 miers
Comment deleted and user banned for impersonating Sam T
Edited By Siteowner
This is a bit off topic, but I think it was very obvious the letter was fake. That was my first thought after reading it. It's just part of the push to gain support for the illegal Iraq War.
Disturbing, but not exactly surprising. The republicans are too interested in turning America into a theocracy to worry about things like "qualifications" and "seperation of powers". Hell, if they can fill the Supreme Court with republican cronies, it just erases the possibility that the pesky First Amendment will get in the way of establishing a national religion and keep them from driving scientific progress back a few hundred years. Sure, we won't be able to make more medication and start using the laying on of hands to cure disease again, but by the time there's a problem all of the politicians will be dead, so no worries for them. And in the meantime, the invisible man in the sky will be happy, or at least they think he will be.
yea, it really was. that would explain why it was written with crayon in poor& fragmented english reminiscent of that of a 3 year-old. but rest assured that bush and his cronies will never admit that they forged the letter after a long nights sniffing crack, drinking, and having hallucinations misinterpereted as visions of jesus christ telling them to liberate the swiss.
Or of the invisible man in the sky telling Dubya to invade yet another oil-rich middle-eastern country under false pretenses. But he'd never admit to any of that, of course. *looks further down the blog* Oh, wait, he did, my bad.
Sam , based on what I just read, (and I didnt treally understand it because I dont watch the news and do all that because I am always in front of the computer) This country is just getting more swewed up!! Day after day!
how did you send this update if your computer broke
I honestly don't understand why some politicians seem to appease a particularly agressive religious group pushing for theocracy.
I mean.. there have been theocracies in the past. And it was called the Dark Ages. There is at least one theocracy now that comes to mind. And we all know it as Iran.
I'm fine with everyone believing whatever they want. If they want to believe in a giant frog that catches the souls of the unworthy with its giant holy sticky tongue. Good for them. However, when people like that try to convert me. After my initial probably polite dismissal. It becomes really annoying.
I think thats the problem with convertionalist fundies. They are so convinced they are doing 'God's Work(TM)' That anything not agreeing wholeheartedly with them is off the devil. Which makes it completely impossible to reason with them.
Not that anyone should want to deal with them. These are people who scream about the love of God all the time. Yet also insist on having five-minute hate style meetings on those who even politely critize them. And they will describe their religion in flowery terms. Yet it boils down to. 'Worship God or SUFFER! ETERNALLY!' Some God of love... As I read somewhere recently. 'Accept God's Eternal Love or Burn in Hell.'
Do these people even know what progress is? I mean, you can go back to the chimps we were and find more intelligent reasons to fight than what we are doing right now. Religion is primitive (not that I hold anything against people who practice it.) Hold your beliefs, but trying to "convert" is probably the most pointless and intrusive thing to do. Might as well become a third world country if the religious hoo-hahs get in.
Of course they know what progress is. However, they also seem to know that they are against it, at least as far as scientific and social progress goes. The conservative religious groups were against many things that we now consider indispensible parts of society, like the US Constitution (one of the dissents from the Anti-Federalist groups was that the Constitution contained no mention of God), and it seems that they are still against the document, because it now is preventing them from making a theocracy. They've also made progress in their own fields by, for example, showing that they CAN in fact screw the Constitution to Hell and do whatever they want in the name of "security", and the people will buy it, at least for long enough to pass it (The Patriot Acts I & II come to mind). Who knows, maybe people will buy it if they say that to be "secure" the entire country must also "find Jesus", and if you don't you will be sent to re-education in Guatanamo Bay or somewhere similar in that you can be sent there for a very long time without any charges brought against you. I imagine that soon the word "Terrorist" will come to mean "anyone not believing in Judeo-Christianity". Hopefully I will be proved wrong, however.
This one's deffinately going to be in the nex issue of Freethought Today. The FFR/AA love to sue so much that' they'd sue Bush & his judge candidate if they thought they could get away from it.
I am not surprised by this. These people are good for proclaiming to be "Godly" but are intolerant towards others who don't share the same opinion that they do. How does that qualify for Supreme Court judge? *Shakes head in disgust*
Apparently, your qualifications or whether or not you subsribe to a religion that encourages bigotry has nothing to do with being a good judge, unless you are talking to someone who doesn't want a judge on the Supreme Court for the express purpose of ignoring the Constitution while they set up a theocracy.
Now, now, now.
Remember, kids. The only qualifications you need to become a high-ranking politician in the good ol' US of A are being pro-life and Christian.
Honestly. After the '04 election, how could you think otherwise? *sigh*
Could Bush find a less qualified candidate for the Supreme Court? Sheesh, he makes me sick, and I'm not even old enough to vote yet!
You're website looks very good, it was a pleasure to be on you're. Keep on the good work 
imitrex concerns what is levaquin used for lamictal depression
Commenting by HaloScan
