Steve Green is to blogging what John Holmes was to enormous penises.
The analogy is that he, uh, has one?
Holmes wasn't gay. So it's not like he was an expert on enormous penises. It's not like he had a lot of them around. Just the one. So that means Stephen Green has one blog.
This is going to keep me awake at night.
Not that you're asking, but why I keep reminding people of Goldstein's fixation on cock is not at all that it's "gay" or anything, but that it's curious that Goldstein refers to cock so often yet has the biggest macho complex since George Thorogood.
Goldstien's ultimate insult is to tell someone that they're insufficiently masculine. And at the same time, he's always talking about cock. It's kinda like with John Derbyshire with his fixation on 'teh gay" -- it has that "Why Do These Homosexuals Keep Sucking My Cock" (google the phrase if you dont recognise it) ring to it.
Same with chickenhawk/chickenshit Goldstien: Someone talking up their own masculinity that much while rhetorically fondling his junk and your own all the fucking time is just too fucking creepy.
Plus, he's a talentless asshole. I want to humiliate him. I want to make him cry.
Well he does have the one talent: formulating ingeniously verbose posts based on points he hasn't actually established with evidence. First-class wankery.
PS: Shout-out! W00T! I totally finished the story to my satisfaction, too.
"Steve Green is to blogging what John Holmes was to enormous penises."
So ... an ugly, stupid, drug-addled loser who failed at everything he tried, but managed to exploit a freak-of-nature mutation into a career of degrading other people? Way to go, Steve!
Commenting by HaloScan
