So, let me understand this:
1. AIDS in America is pretty much trivial, so the pharmaceutical companies and well-paid AIDS activists have set their sights on South Africa.
2. In South Africa, hundreds of thousands of blacks work in the asbestos mines and diamond mines, where they suffer from all sorts of lung maladies.
3. There is a convergence of interest to blame these illnesses on "AIDS" --(a) its gets the mining/diamond companies off the hook, (2) it generates faux "sympathy" for these blacks and (3) it provides a huge market for the pharmaceutical drugs.
Definitely sounds plausible.
Kick butt, Clark!
If you carefully check the 1600 mining companies, you’ll see a significant representation of UN member states that profit by sacking Africa’s mineral wealth.
To countries like the US, this sacking is in our national security interest - which is why the quasi-military NIH participates in the cover-up of that sacking. If it comes between mining ores like gold, platinum and uranium and the health of Africa's dispensable labor force, that 100-year-old decision is easy. Blaming their dust-related mortality on AIDS perpetuates mythologies that pressure Congress to send more AID and drugs to Africa under the pretext of compassion, while gay advocacy groups push AIDS as a human rights issue.
Such a scheme would make Machiavelli weep with joy.
Thanks for writing.
Clark,
are you saying there are ties between DeBeers and NIH or the myth was carried on since Debeers needed it to be? I know Debeers is ruthless and they do what it takes to protect their fortune.
Commenting by HaloScan
