so, the Forest Service wants to let fires burn to erase any prior trace of roads or something? Why is that?

I think I remember hearing about "inholders" and their access rights. Is this to deny them access to their property or something?

I do have to agree though, that sometimes fires are important to the ecosystem.
Standard Mischief | Homepage | 09.09.06 - 4:02 pm | #

yea, found it. go google "RS 2477"
Standard Mischief | Homepage | 09.09.06 - 6:53 pm | #

As an off-road motorcyclist I'm not surprised at any of this, the Forest Service is one of those departments that got taken-over in the 80's and is run by the ecoweenies for the most part now..
DirtCrashr | Homepage | 09.15.06 - 2:29 pm | #

"I would much rather we return the other Washington to wilderness status."

It started life as a swamp, and it still is. I know. I live there. Kinda' tough to burn a swamp tho'.
Roland the Headless Thompson G | 11.07.06 - 7:20 am | #

now that its been a year and a day since your last post I think we can safely say you really aren't " Still Shooting From the Hip".
Mors | 09.09.07 - 9:11 am | #

True, true. Time passes on. I have been seeing results happening with very well-placed shots over at www.OpenCarry.org
FishOrMan | 11.22.07 - 7:49 pm | #