so, the Forest Service wants to let fires burn to erase any prior trace of roads or something? Why is that?
I think I remember hearing about "inholders" and their access rights. Is this to deny them access to their property or something?
I do have to agree though, that sometimes fires are important to the ecosystem.
yea, found it. go google "RS 2477"
As an off-road motorcyclist I'm not surprised at any of this, the Forest Service is one of those departments that got taken-over in the 80's and is run by the ecoweenies for the most part now..
"I would much rather we return the other Washington to wilderness status."
It started life as a swamp, and it still is. I know. I live there. Kinda' tough to burn a swamp tho'.
now that its been a year and a day since your last post I think we can safely say you really aren't " Still Shooting From the Hip".
True, true. Time passes on. I have been seeing results happening with very well-placed shots over at www.OpenCarry.org
two years now, and I still have no idea how that case turned out. two years on my daily web list. you send me to open carry? seen nothing from you there either. whats going on?
ok, I gives up
Commenting by HaloScan
