"There is no challange to US superiority in space"
Even if their was a challenge, why would you possibly need to consider developing weaponary that would serve no purpose and cost billions to implement.
Money that could be spent on other important things to the us economy. Like more war! They would have to impose a limit of like 1 war/ foreign invasion per year! How would the US cope?
It's all a bit science fiction for me, i think that the US needs to concentrate on givingordinary american people access to fair medical assistance before you think about blowing each other up with space guns.
Yeah, but I'd rather put that money into other defense or tax cuts.
Health care isn't of much use if you have people like NK or Iran dropping nukes on you. We'd have plenty of money if we weren't throwing it down rat holes like Palestine that hate us for it anyway.
Yeah, my first reaction to hearing this was that we should probably be using that money to further secure our ports and borders. Way too much cargo and way too many people come into this country undetected every day. If president Bush is truly concerned about the very real threat of nuclear (nucular, whatever) terrorism as he said he was in the campaign, he would focus more resources to preventing it rather than making sure Mars doesn't attack. I just can't really see what he is thinking with this one.
"There is no challange to US superiority in space"
Good. Let us keep it that way. Remember, libs wanted to abort the Stealth
Hey, I've noticed why your still an "Insignificant Microbe" in the TTLB Ecosystem.
You registered your blog as "jokerstheright.blogspot.com" instead of jokersTOtheright.blogspot.com"
You might want to go back and correct that to start rising up in the ecosystem. It's pretty fun.
I tried...it hasn't been working. I'm going to reregister today.
Commenting by HaloScan
