Comments are being moderated. All comments are welcome but offensive remarks will not be tolerated.
|
|
Hair epic hunting dragons metal anyone?
Albertito |
10.07.09 - 3:34 am | #
|
|
Hmmm .. not my cup of tea at all I'm afraid. I'll take the Mosrite!
kieren |
10.07.09 - 9:08 am | #
|
|
if jimmy page would have played this guitar, everybody would love it...
bertram |
Homepage |
10.07.09 - 9:13 am | #
|
|
As if to prove there's more to it than just tapering in the necks.
Andy S |
Homepage |
10.07.09 - 11:09 am | #
|
|
There a lot going on on the body.
I do like the tuners on the body, as it keeps the headstock looking clean, but all the extra knobs, especially arranged that way, just loses something.
Not that the phallic horn poking out back helps matters.
Give me the Gretsch.
The Mert |
Homepage |
10.07.09 - 2:05 pm | #
|
|
I like the Mosrite the best. However I must say that for some reason the Mockingbird and Bich bodies really never struck me as pointy metal guitars. Probably because I remember them being played in the 70's long before everything got that way(pointy and metal). A Warlock however....UGH!
Dan W. |
10.07.09 - 9:11 pm | #
|
|
I like the tuner arrangement as well, but those knobs... way too many to be useful.
Guitar Hunter |
Homepage |
10.07.09 - 9:16 pm | #
|
|
It's strange that, even though in the grand scheme of the universe the previously posted Mosrite Maphis doubleneck and this BC Rich are functionally identical instruments, the small differences between them render, to me, the Mosrite as unfathomably cool while the BC Rich is unforgivably offensive.
O Aesthetics - will we ever understand how or why we feel the way we do?
dre |
10.07.09 - 11:59 pm | #
|
|
The cut in the back of this BC Rich looks strikingly like this 1983 Gibson Futura...
Gibson should think of a Futura Double Neck. That would totally rock!
Iconic Guitars |
Homepage |
12.07.09 - 4:38 am | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|