Epistles from the Apostles
Hopefully next time he won't hold back, like he did on this song.
"No blogger has a RIGHT to remain anonymous on the Internet"
What a load of crap. Iain is a tool, Matt. Shame he found your identity.
There is an apt description of Iain on another thread by PKD.
By the way, did you notice that the quote about THR's bounty on Scrotewatch is signed "Iain;Hall". He included the semicolon. The guy is a fucken fool.
"Finally let me just reiterate this point that I made to Matthew in the correspondence that I link to above.
No blogger has a RIGHT to remain anonymous on the Internet, especially if they have used their anonymity as a license to slander or defame people who write in their own names."
Deluded muppet. There may be no right to anonymity but there is a right to privacy. Slapping peoples personal details all over the internet without their permission is seriously wrong.
Just quietly, the patronising, overconfident, morally superior tone of his posts ? Drives me spare.
You're a WOMAN.
You don't know how men FIGHT.
Even on the internet.
The morally superior tone is a trademark of practically all right-wing blogs. When you're as deficient in, well, everything as Iain Ha;; you have to do something to go one up on everyone else.
The sad fact is, Iain isn't confident at all. I know when I've made a mistake in something I've said, I know when I've done something wrong. I admit it, yet Iain is still defending his stalking actions of 2006 because admitting he made mistake would be letting the socialist collectives win, and where would conservatism be?
"By the way, did you notice that the quote about THR's bounty on Scrotewatch is signed "Iain;Hall". He included the semicolon. The guy is a fucken fool."
My god, he did too. That's hilarious.
Chuck
A screen shot means that I have no choice in the matter.
Olivia,
A right to privacy does not include a right to slander and defame.
John
What do you mean John? I know how to fight on the internet with a great deal more integrity than you have ever displayed in your own efforts. Your problem is that you fail to see that events you allude to in early 2006 are by no means at all cut and dried or without their own ambiguities. Don't make the mistake of believing your own propaganda.
A screen shot means that I have no choice in the matter.
Well why don't you find the original quote then Iain. You can get the link for it on the "100% accurate" iainhall.com.
No wonder you are a dismal failure at everything.
chuck
I wanted to make the point that Matthew was posting that quote on the front-page of his blog and I link to the original location of that quote in the text of my post, you should read it again.
Any dispassionate observer would conclude that by posting that quote on the front page that he was in fact daring me to out him, and ironically my informant knew who to contact precisely because of that sidebar widgit.
So the failure here is you 
Whichever way you want to put it Iain. The semicolon is still bloody funny. Who is this mysterious informant anyway, or is it just a made-up person like one of your fake blogs.
"I know how to fight on the internet with a great deal more integrity than you have ever displayed in your own efforts."
By offering bounties! HA! Maybe I should offer a bounty for your head. And lets not forget fake blogs. Lots of integrity, Hall.
BTW this is the internet, not a boxing ring. Don't refer to them as "fights".
Of course "the events of 2006" are cut and dried. You fucked up, but you won't admit it.
Commenting by HaloScan
