DING DING DING DING DING!!!!! -13.... How High can this go???
Remember when even before rigor mortise set in,
Vince Fosters office was relieved of all sorts of
files, never to be seen again. And the Rose
Law Firm files that finally did show up in Hillary's
living quarters. She reminds me of a squirrel.
A Squirrel or a Nut?
Well, at least Hillary can point to this and prove she's been consistent over the years.
Somehow I can't imagine Hillary hiding documents, that seems so out of character for her. Heh heh.
That's like saying al qaeda Ken never says anything repulsively stupid.
Ok Mike you're driving me nuts.
First you do a post that has me convinced that Obama is worse than Hillary. Then you do one that makes me think Hillary is worse than he is.
When oh when will it end!
Tom: I don't know when it will end. We might just have to vote for McCain.
OMG! Hillary lied?!
Imagine, if you can; no liberals. Now that would be a real utopia.
Why that slimey little bitch!
Either way you look at it Nixon wasnt going to get a fair trial no matter what, no wonder he resigned!
I think Marie's "Why that slimey little bitch!" covers it pretty well! 
This is really important information, Mike. I truly hope that Fox News will get ahold of this. Maybe they're saving this sort of stuff for after Clinton is the nominee, if that should be the case. I'm sure more has come out on Obama too. What a pair!
Where was this guy 16 years ago, for that matter 1 year ago? Seems kind of like he lost his fear of the Clintons. Losing fear of the Clintons tells me that maybe we are putting this evil pair on the back burner of history.
Don't forget, while you're looking up all the muck in Hillary and Barack's past to include the adulterous John McCain:
http://tinyurl.com/2yu3pu
"McCain has a reputation as a politician who has difficulty keeping his pants zipped, according to Republican sources. He acknowledges that his adultery broke up his first marriage.
His second wife Cindy, the daughter of a wealthy Budweiser beer distributor, was addicted to prescription narcotics and even stole hard drugs from a medical charity that she ran."
And John's involvement in the Keating 5:
"McCain was one of the "Keating Five," congressmen investigated on ethics charges for strenuously helping convicted racketeer Charles Keating after he gave them large campaign contributions and vacation trips.
Though he was not convicted of anything, McCain intervened on behalf of Charles Keating after Keating gave McCain at least $112,00 in contributions. In the mid-1980s, McCain made at least 9 trips on Keating's airplanes, and 3 of those were to Keating's luxurious retreat in the Bahamas. McCain's wife and father-in-law also were the largest investors (at $350,000) in a Keating shopping center; the Phoenix New Times called it a "sweetheart deal."
Just thought you'd like to be fair and balanced.
Shaw: There is a difference between verifiable events which illuminate the character of a candidate and phony smears that are nothing more than LIES.
I'm not suprised that people who accept lies from their candidates would find it so easy to believe them about others.
Mike,
The problem with this is that it is only those on the right that find this to BE a problem at all. Those on the left are so wrapped up in lies, that they find it perfectly normal and acceptable, especially given that she was trying to take down Nixon. For the liberal, that is all that matters. How it comes about is not important at all. After all, to them, since they live a life of lies, everybody lies, so its OK.
Sad.
Oh. So McCain didn't divorce his wife of 14 years to marry the 25 year old blonde cheerleader whose daddy was a wealthy beer distributor?
And McCain wasn't involved in the Keating 5 scandal?
And his wife Cindy in 1994 didn't narrowly escape criminal charges when she admitted stealing prescriptions from an international aid organization and filling them under an assumed name to feed her drug addiction?
"GOP presidential candidate John McCain's wife Cindy took to the airwaves last week, recounting for Jane Pauley (on "Dateline") and Diane Sawyer (on "Good Morning America") the tale of her onetime addiction to Percocet and Vicodin, and the fact that she stole the drugs from her own nonprofit medical relief organization."
Holy Moly! Cindy McCain even went on national teevee and LIED about herself and her drug addiction and stealing?
Amazing. Just amazing. I wonder why she did that.
But if you say these are all lies, McCain's adultery, his involvement in the Keating 5, and Cindy's drug addiction and fraud, then you must be correct. Afterall, you and the 28% who still think George W. Bush is a swell president and the Iraq war is being won, couldn't possibly be wrong.
There's that liberal again trying to justify bad behavior by pointing out someone else's bad behavior. It is typical for liberals to do that to change the subject and attempt to draw attention away from the subject at hand. I saw nothing in the article about John McCain, what difference does it make what John McCain has done when we are discussing the extreme behavior of Hillary Clinton? If you're looking for people to justify anything McCain has done madam liberal I think you may be in the wrong place.
Jennifer and Timothy: You and I recognize that tactic from the lefty play book. It's another version of "everyone does it" moral equivalence.
And if "everyone does it" then why not vote for the guy who claims he cares more? Even though their "caring" has never actually solved any problem (poverty, health care, education, environment.....).
But then Shaw goes one further peddling his smears.
You're right... anything to change the subject.
Shaw is a liar and so of course he's going to vote for someone just like him.
Would it be safe to say he's a "typical Democrat?"
Mommy he did it to, why are you yelling at me. Goodness liberals never grow up, lie, cheat, steal, get caught, He/She did it to. This is getting down right scary, I have no use for John McCain, but at least I see his warts and struggle with his positions, I don't pretend that he's pure as the driven snow. If I vote for him I'll do it knowing full well that I'll never agree with him on a lot of positions.
No, people. Wrong again--as usual.
You condemn and besmirch Clinton and Obama, but ignore what the Republican candidate has in his past.
Okay. I understand that. You don't want to acknowledge the log in your eye.
It's not a matter of "he did it too."
It's hypocrisy, which is the mainstay of the Republican Party.
And a majority of Americans agree.
They don't like you guys. They see through your double standards and equivocations.
Hillary and Obama = Bad, liars.
McCain = good liar.
But no one expects you to understand. It's too nuanced.
Pffft! We've been among John McCain's harshest critics. I put it to McCain DIRECTLY to his face at a meeting here last November.
No, I didn't waste my time with the future President discussing your phony smears. I have SUBSTANTIVE differences with him that I wanted to discuss.
I don't notice too many Democrats confronting Obama or Hillary on the weak points of their program.
But then, I don't notice too many of you that really care what they say. You know it's all a big con game anyway so why bother?
I think you got it wrong again shaw liberal.
Obama= extremely bad for the country, liar, race hustler, no experience, and left of Lenin. It gets deeper everyday with this moron and his ill tempered and ungrateful wife.
Clinton= extremely bad for the country, liar, inexperienced, megalomaniac, left of Mao, did I mention she is a liar?
McCain=not quite as bad for the country but still very unacceptable because he stabbed his own troops and their families in the back.
How about talking about Clinton, she was the subject of the post. Did I say she is a liar and a scoundrel.
All three of the mental midgets that are left in this campaign deserve nothing less than a good thrashing for being no good for anything. I wouldn't hire any of those three to clean the bathrooms in shop I supervise. The parties ought to be ashamed of themselves for giving us these three unqualified, undeserving and useless pieces of human debris for us to choose from for such an important job.
Shaw's just an enabler for liars. Raymond on another thread offers another variation on this theme to shield racists from accountability.
Dang, I guess the Clinton machine is losing its fear factor.
Hillary as a squirrel? Not really, she is willing to hide or destroy evidence that is bad for her but likes to keep evidence that she can use against others. She is an extortionist, a flim-flam artist, a snake-oil peddler, a shyster. Characteristics at odds with what is needed to be President.
Denver is going to be so interesting.
Anna said... flim flam artist.
Heh heh I haven't heard that one for quite some time. That phrase reminds me of the movie "The Sting". Maybe that would be a good theme for the democrak convention complete with the Scott Joplin song "The Entertainer" being the theme song
all i have to say is she is a marxist what else do you expect from her but lies.
You want to get a real laugh go look at Shaw the commies blog..LOL
No thanks troll, ran out of bleach, I'll take your word for it.
"verifiable events which illuminate the character of a candidate"
Exactly Miller, as when the camera lens pulled back and a multitude of troops were found protecting McCain
in "safe" Baghdad.
Or when he said days before the Maliki assault led to an al Sadr victory, he didn't believe the Mahdi Army was a formidable force anymore.
Hoop: In case you haven't noticed, the post on which you are commenting is about Hillary Clinton and has nothing to do with Iraq or Maliki.
Pay no attention to the guy behind the shower curtain, its Ken.
Dorothy, click those heels!
Commenting by HaloScan
