DING DING DING DING DING!!!!! -13.... How High can this go???
Sounds like something Hillary might have said during Bill's presidency, but now repudiates.
On a different subject:
Remember the Haditha, Iraq, incident where our Marines were accused of intentionally killing innocent civilians? I have been solicited for a contribution to the Legal Defense fund of one those Marines.
I thought JAG would have furnished their defense without charge. Anybody know whether or not they did so?
If not, why am I solicited by only one of many of the Marines involved? Anybody have any idea about that?
I am inclined to make a donation if this is not a scam. What do you think??
My guess would be the Hildabeast. She was hawkish on Iran until she saw it was not politically viable with the leftists in her party....and of course because Bush was also hawkish!
Is it just that easy?
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20...st-
century.html
Papa Jack: Don't know the answer to your question about the Haditha Marine's Defense fund. Does the solicitation have a link to a web page?
Some of these solicitations are fundraisers that don't directly benefit the people they cite in their appeal. You have to be careful.
O.K. at first I thought of Bolton, but must say Hillary..
papajack go to floppingaces and post the question there you'll probably get your answer. I know most have been cleared but not sure if its 100%
Oh as for the quotes my first thought was bill but hill and bill both have the same writers....
The winner gets a prize awarded by Wordsmith
Great. Thanks to you, Mike, some commenter I've "never met" left a comment at your link to my comment section, asking for her prize!
We're going to get sued big time for running a scam contest.
Waitaminute...."we"?!
YOU, are going to get sued bigtime!
My hands are clean!
Wordsmith: Someone with your experience in rigged caption contests should have no problem running this scam 
I'm late as usual, but my answer, before reading the other comments was "Hillary". it's exactly the sort of duplicitous statement she is likely to utter.
I'm late as usual too. But I think you are all wrong. It's Rick Warren!
Blessings
Who was that woman on your site? I looked at the blog she put as her homepage it was interesting. The name of it wasn't cool but what I glanced in the posts wasn't bad....
besides wordsmith I thought you said the prize was one of Mikes flowers out of his garden....
the Israeli lobby loses one! The truth comes out before the warmongering neocons can butcher Iran like they tried Iraq. I say they tried Iraq, but they got a little bogged down, and -er-increased Iran's influence in Irag by about 50%, so they've had to spend the past few months arming the Sunni militias to offset the Shia government in Iraq and distract everyone with the Al Qaeda straw man.
No matter-the enxt Iraqi government will be anti-American whenever it stabilizes-and Iran will be the dominant factor in the region as America's military power is sapped.
And all Bush can do is fume and threaten.
http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/69591/
Patriot intelligence man Ray McGovern warns about the fuming as he supports the corrected intelligence.
http://www.davidduke.com/general...m-
now_3198.html
George Bush in commenting on the report, shows again he is a danger to the republic who needs to be impeached, prominent Republican says.
Thanks Hoop: Another collection of cuckoo web links. You do like that KKK guy David Duke don't you?
P.S. Wordsmith has been missing you:
https://www.blogger.com/
comment.g...358310370326874
Hey Mike, I guess I am on time to join the party this time. Seriously I have been following your blog for some time and I would be happy to stop posting pro-Ron Paul messages if this is in any way offensive.
I have here the actual 2002 speech that Ron Paul gave to congress on why he would vote against the war in Iraq.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8...h?
v=8TZ5cpaPlf4
Interestingly enough he sounds almost diametrically opposed to Hillary...
http://naqniq.wordpress.com/2007...does-the-davka/
this must be a fave site of yours, Miller...but has Bush really turned against the Jewish state?
Kevin:Speaking only for myself, I don't find Ron Paul offensive. I do find him entertaining.
What we need to explore is whether his isolationist/America First outlook is compatible with our responsibilities as a global power.
We learned the hard way in December 1941 that whether we liked it or not, we could not avoid the challenges of leadership in an interdependent world.
If anything has changed since then, it is the degree to which we are linked to events which happen far from our shores.
Hoop: Wordsmith beckons you:
https://www.blogger.com/
comment.g...358310370326874
Mike,
Thanks, that is a very fair assesment.
I can't wait to see who you will support for this comming election. I had you pegged as McCain all the way but now he is looking less and less electable. I hope to see more blogs on this in the near future.
McCain? Not sure what you based that assessment on. I'm not a big McCain fan. And my decision has nothing to do with McCain's electability.
All will be clear very soon.
Mike,
>All will be clear very soon.
looking forward to it, and I am glad to hear that you don't place "electability" into your equation.
Kevin: I wouldn't say that electability is not a factor. It's just not a factor with McCain.
I am glad to hear that you don't place "electability" into your equation.
I find it "disturbing" if you don't.
Mike,
You are right, McCain is still in the running. I thought I saw him running fifth but it was probably just an Iowa poll.
Wordsmith,
I am only thirty four, too young to give up on my beliefs for "electability" reasons
Kevin: So what will you do when Ron Paul gets only a few percentage points in each of the primaries? Are you willing to back the eventual GOP nominee?
Hah! Kevin, in five years, you'll have "caught up" to my age.
Elaborating my line of thinking.
http://www.davidduke.com/
general...roost_3207.html
Bush needs to resign after another dose of lying, first about iraq,now about Iran.
Kucinich has expressed interest in running with Paul, perhaps third party. Has said he will not support any Dem who voted for the war or believes in a warlike Mideast policy.
I suggest Kevin be equally discriminating.
Kevin: You see who your fellow Paulians are.... Not pretty!
Did you send Duke congrats as a fellow Repub when he won office in La. Miller?
Mike,
>Are you willing to back the eventual GOP nominee?
Are you kidding? Of course I will back the eventual GOP nominee.
I support Ron Paul just like I supported Buchanan in 96 (and for many of the same reasons). And yes I have said this before but I would support the GOP nominee even if Ron Paul where to run as third party (which he has no intention of doing).
>Kevin: You see who your fellow Paulians are.... Not pretty!
You should have seen me in 96 on the back of a pick up truck gathering up Democratic candidate's yard signs For many of them this is their first political awakening. You can brush them off or take advantage of it.
Over at Floppingaces the contest said that I won.No prize and I might have to become a "demoncrat" or something even worse (sorry there is nothing worse). My son is crushed to find out this was another scam and has decided to become a socialist. My wife said she is now going to vote for Ron Paul or Denis Kucinich because neither of them would do such a dastardly deed.
Jim: Well, as long as you don't do anything drastic....
But Wordsmith is in charge of the prize patrol. Don't tell me he is falling down on the job AGAIN!
Commenting by HaloScan
