I'm not convinced there are any Clinton bitter-enders of the type you describe anymore. The arguments I heard for Clinton can be grouped into three loose categories: rational, tactical, and conspiratorial-personal. The first is "Clinton is simply a better candidate," the second is "Clinton is more electable," and the third is "Clinton isn't an elitist mulatto Marxist crypto-Muslim."

Everyone I recall arguing from the first two positions has either now backed Obama or completely fallen into the third position. Larry Johnson feigns an electability gripe, but it's based purely on racist or conspiratorial justifications. His commenters certainly aren't fooled.
Djur | Homepage | 06.26.08 - 8:57 am | #