Now you're getting Wiggy with it
AG Goodhair wanted a quick and dirty check done in little to no time and he wanted all mismatches pitched off the voting rolls.
This ain't that and you should know that.
Let me get this straight... JB wanted the work done when the clerks were swamped with new registrations and early absentee voting and now the checks can be done over time, without the rush. And this is inconsistent how?
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
I like that!
Weak, James. You know perfectly well the difference. But then, we all get partisan on occasion.
This is JB's fault for expecting the Doyle administration to follow the law. He should have filed his suit right after HAVA was enacted...
Hi Terry, unfortunately JB couldn't act until the board did.
And no, Tim, I don't understand the difference. The only explanation I have seen so far is that the one standard was more of a burden on the clerks than the other. Nothing to explain the abuse Van Hollen took for his lawsuit.
Oh, wait, I do know the difference. Van Hollen is a Republican. That explains everything.
Oops.
I neglected to point out my sarcasm in my last sentence.
Sure you do. One was a partisan effort to bog down the election -- the other decision the correct one leaving plenty of time to do the job.
btw: If a Democrat had taken the same route as Van Hollen (though doubtful since Dems actually care that people are able to vote without fear or harassment) I would have lamented his/her efforts, too.
I actually thought you would have done the same with Van Hollen. Silly me.
It's especially relevant since no fraud was determined in this election. What a surprise.
This is pathetic, James.
We had no fraud..no charges yet filed. Where are the thousands in Wisconsin?
You and Van Hollen were 100% wrong, and you cannot admit that.
Stubborn is not your position..it's delusional, at this point.
No state has 100% HAVA matching, completed.
Using your thinking...Van Hollen is Stalin-like in his approach to voting.
He intended to disrupt it.
Stalin was great at that.
So, is Van Hollen using Soviet election processes?
Let the speculation begin, James...and are you also part of that communist attempt to take over America's elections?
How easy it is to write like a Limbaugh.
We fired the Republican ideology, and no ballots were corrupt, as you implied.
James, it's time to fade away, like all good little Stalinists did.
до свидания
Now I'm confused. Wintourgost sounds like Gus/Mickey, but...
Commenting by HaloScan
