Either in the tank or very, very ironic.
I'd say the first one
Don't worry - it will turn around. It always does - comes full-circle, like it did for this guy:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/
0,2...,361061,00.html
Remember how he was a media darling? Look at him now. Check your own P.O.S. blog for hat-tips to Hastert - you were in the tank for him too. Now, are you still for him? Even FOX has turned against him. Are you stupider than FOX, stupider than Malkin, or . . .BOTH!
where were you people when the media was taking pictures like this of your dear leader the last 8 years?
The media was in the tank for him then, and they were right? But they're wrong NOW? Tsk, tsk - a little consistency please Mr Jammiewearing Fool - lest we start taking your little blog's title as literal.
Hmm. "yourConscience" and "consistency" are posting from the same IP address out of St. Paul, Minnesota.
"... he quit his Chicago church in the aftermath of inflammatory sermons" he has been hearing for some tewnty years - the final straw appears o have been a white preacher spouting hatred against non-blacks, viewed as over-doing the racist - er, racial, that is color-blind, um... - discourse.
After looking for an image that would make B Hussein seem gazing "into the future," they put a halo around it and sent it out. Obamamessiah just looks snooty and supercilious to me. BTW, consistency, please link for me any purportedly serious media pictures that make the President look like a sainted, haloed savior. Puhleeeze.
Obama has suck a charming smile he'll amke a good pres
/Sarc
ooops i mean such*
Commenting by HaloScan
