"That giant sucking sound you just heard was the air being let out of the Truther balloons."
Not really. Do you know who owns the AP who released this article? I bet you don't. Do you know the story behind the creation of Bin-Laden, Al-CIA-DA, etc?
Until you understand who owns the AP, and the agenda of the Family behind it, you need to research more.
Ahmahdinejad may be not be afraid of America or Europe but he had better pay attention to what this head bumping physcopath says. Wouldn't want there to suddenly be an outbreak of Sunni on Shiite violence in Iran now would we? Of course maybe it will suck the Mahdi army syncopants out of Iraq to go fight them.
It does however show just how isolated and desperate Al Queda is becoming. Keep up the pressure.
The original Troofer was Hamid Gul who used to be in Pakistan's ISI. You can easily find the 9/26/01 interview where he put forth the myth if you google his name.
What's most interesting about this is the claim of invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan - he's referencing Al Quds and Hezb'allah forces there, and he referenced these groups in his last message as well (see the sections dealing with "Kharjarites".) There's a battle of one-upmanship going on between shia and sunni terror groups to prove who is the most Jihadi. The schism widens every day, and the recent mosque bombing in Iran by Sunni Jihad as well as the ongoing sectarian (Shia Hazara vs Sunni Pashtun) strife in Parachinar are but salvos in that war.
joseph, excuse my French, but you're a fucking moron.
When Islam conquers the world and has killed off all the nonbelievers can we look forward to shiites fighting sunnis to the death and then a vs.b,b vs.c etc.?Islamic peace.MA.
Didn't you hear? It was the psychiatrists who were behind 9/11. At least, that's what Tom Cruise told me.
The Truther Movement -
Allowing people to display their delusional paranoia since 9/11.
Thanks to Joseph for reminding us of that.
The comments in a recording posted on an Islamic Web site reflected the increasing criticism by al-Qaida's No. 2 leader Ayman al-Zawahri against Iran. Al-Zawahri has accused Iran in recent messages of seeking to extend its power in the Middle East, particularly in Iraq and through its Hezbollah allies in Lebanon.
Possible allies in the war against Iran! We should send them weapons for their yearning for "freedom"! A nation which rejected Ron Paul (America for white gentiles; immigrants out; uppity minorities STFU) has no other option.
I guess the Sunnis and the Shia can beat each other to death fighting over whether it was LIHOP or MIHOP.
Also, joseph, the AP is actually a membership organization owned by the newspapers and other news companies that are part of it. It isn't so hard for us human beings to understand. That said I'd be happy to see you join "The Family".
Mr Totaltarian, if we had gone with Ron Paul then what you say might have been the only way, but without Paul we have lots of other options - such as killing them both.
Maybe Fake-Qaeda can launch long range camels and H1B visa carrying ninjas into Iran... of course Fake-Qaeda is a CIA front! Who gave them the Ford truchs to taxi their camel launchers across Afganistan?
Boogie boogie boogie! If you're a patriot, fear the camel!
A nation which rejected Ron Paul (America for white gentiles; immigrants out; uppity minorities STFU) has no other option.
Totaltaria
I wonder what race you are. Are you one of those Whites who think we minorities somehow require your goodwill, wisdom and support?
Various people here seem to be confusing the 9/11 Truth movement in general with its noisiest subset, the folks who hold a pure "MIHOP" view. (See What is your HOP Level? Ten 9/11 Paradigms by Nicholas Levis.) There are also plenty of other people who don't deny that the U.S. was attacked by al-Qaeda terrorists, but who believe that the U.S. government didn't do all it could have to defend the country on that day, and that various high officials are guilty of at least criminal negligence and possibly worse. (See U.S. government foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks, on my blog.)
What defines the 9/11 Truth movement is not any particular view of what did or didn't happen, but rather the call for a new and independent investigation. To that end, some sectors of the movement make better arguments than others.
What defines the 9/11 Truth movement is not any particular view of what did or didn't happen, but rather a tendency to keep harping on the same retarded theories while ignoring all the evidence which doesn't fit.
What defines the Troof 'movement' is the fact that the rest of us aren't allowed to beat them into a bloody pulp.
Yet.
BTW, 'Diane', you fucking fascist bitch, the US government could have been told all about the plan to hit the Towers, et al, and legally they could have done NOTHING.
The ACLU, among others, have made sure of that.
And people like you have made sure that if NYC gets hit again, the rest of us are going to turn our backs on you.
You are worthless scum.
One does not need to "harp on" any "theories" to see that the 9/11 Commission had a problem with conflicts of interest. (See, for example, this New York times article.)
As for the claim that "the US government could have been told all about the plan to hit the Towers, et al, and legally they could have done NOTHING," that's ridiculous. All sorts of things could have been done. Airport security could have been alerted. Pilots could have been advised to close cockpit doors (as they were advised, belatedly, on 9/11). Air traffic controllers could have been reminded to follow emergency protocol immediately if a plane went off-course. And the Air Force could have been alerted, increasing the chances that any hijacked aircraft could have been intercepted.
Apache, why are you so deeply attached to the idea that the U.S. government did the best it possibly could have on 9/11 that you would want to "beat to a bloody pulp" anyone who thinks otherwise?
Commenting by HaloScan
