Only in the LA Times is questioning someones utter and total lack of executive experience an "attack".
I found this passage equally compelling:
Also, the Republican Party's dismal standing under President Bush remains a drag on McCain's candidacy: 75% of voters say the country is seriously on the wrong track.
Uh, who has controlled Congress for the last 2 years ensuring that virtually nothing has been accomplished? Even worse, Congress was controlled by the Dems for 4 of Bush's 8 years, and somehow, its the Republicans that are to blame for the "wrong track".
The bigger story is of course, that Congressional approval ratings under Pelosi/Reid are lower than the Presidents. Then again, don't look for that to be mentioned in the LA Fishwraper.
The reporter on this, Michael Finnegan, is an unreconstructed Bolshie, one of the most obviously lazy biased liberal reporters in the West Coast game. Straight up commie.
Openly hostile to and suspicious of anything a Republican campaign tells him. No sense of good humor either. A damp rag, like his newspaper. I've seen him in action at pressers by both parties: predisposed to not believe Reps while at the same time swallowing Demo press releases whole. I've seen it happen with this guy many many times.
So, its no real surprise that the narrative is slanted to cover for He Whose Name May Not Be Uttered.
If mccain chooses a pro-abortion VP this inexperienced fraud will win
Commenting by HaloScan
