The difference between "favoring" infanticide and saying "move along, there's nothing to see here" is alarmingly small in any one instance of considering a bill like the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. When the same chance is swatted away four times, then yes, the guy swatting it has something to answer for. And Obama can't point to "pro-choice" precedent, because even other NARAL lackeys in the U.S. Senate didn't make the mistake he did.
Patrick | 09.22.08 - 1:39 pm | #