This Is Not A Democracy, It's A Republic........
"Joe Lieberman is out of step with the people of Connecticut," Kerry added, insisting Lieberman's stance on Iraq, "shows you just why he got in trouble with the Democrats there."
Yup, he was in trouble with Democrats (atleast the ones that voted in the primary)… the majority of voters in CT are democrats, not all voted in the primary.
So now that he has a double-digit lead over Lamont in the polls I suppose I should wait for Kerry’s next quote saying how CT Democrats are out of step of many people in the state. When will Kerry claim Lamont and the democrats are in trouble with VOTERS in CT??
I'll be waiting Senator.
the majority of voters in CT are democrats
Actually, MD, the plurality of CT voters are unaffiliated. Granted, they vote Dem more often than not, but because they are unaffiliated, they couldn't vote in the primary.
Kerry should have been more truthful (I know, "fat chance"), and should have said that "Joe Lieberman is out of step with the Democrats of Connecticut." THAT would have been more accurate.
Unfortunately for Jean-Francois Heinz-Kerry and his leftist ilk, Joe gets to make his case to the Republican AND unaffiliated voters of CT, as well as the Dems who voted for him in the primary. If Senator Ketchup is correct and truly "Joe Lieberman is out of step with the people of Connecticut", then he and Lamont and the rest of the leftisphere have nothing to worry about, n'est-ce pas?
Joe Lieberman is basically the outcast of the Democratic party. Even though he disagrees on Republicans on some points. This just shows you that Democrats only really care about one issue, and that's a bad platform to have.
For a senior politician, Kerry has the worst timing I've ever seen, not to mention his incurable case of "foot in mouth" disease.
Or in this case "donkey balls in mouth" disease.
I like the sound of dog farts, don't put them on the same level as John Kerry's spew.
I'd rather shove a pen in my ear than listen to his BS.
"While you're at it, don't forget to ask Teddy how to kill a woman and get away with it."
You make it sound as if government officials killing people and getting away with it is a partisan issue.
If you're that angry about Teddy, look into some of those committed by your own. Then get angry at the system. Don't single out just the democrats, hypocrite.
That was a funny post. I like it.
Cheers,
Walt
"democrats, hypocrite"
Nice Pete!! No two words in the english language compliment each other more than these two together.
Pete,
Are you referring to any particular Republicans? Or, are you just spewing more unfounded rhetoric?
Can you name any Republicans that have murdered and gotten away with it?
Hmmm...
Kerry couldn't keep his mouth shut if his life depended on it. He IS a loser - the American voters decided that question two years ago. Yet he now sits on his high horse saying tripe such as, "If I were president this would never have happened."
Yea - we would have frenched and we all would be bowing five times a day to mecca! JERK!
Pete doesn't know what he's talking about. His schtick is: Bush lied, kids and Iraqi's died.
Kennedy is a murderer and it just goes to show you how a "family" connection can save your ass.
John Kerry's life has been consumed by political ambition. Fortunately for us he's not very good at it.
What he is good at though is:
- Lying about his fellow soldiers
- Wind Sailing
- Exemplifying his French heritage
- Being a role model for future gigolos who have dreams of marrying rich women
Joe Liberman is better off without the Democratic Party as it's now been Hijacked by the Liberal, Loony, Moonbats..
There was a recent poll where Liberman was ahead of Lamont. I think Liberman will win and it will be a sign to the remaining moderates in the Democratic Party it's time to jump ship and follow Liberman..
I think Liberman will win and it will be a sign to the remaining moderates in the Democratic Party it's time to jump ship and follow Liberman..
Johnny Utah
Naw! They'll (the moonbats) just say the evil machines (a-la McKinney) hijacked the election from Lamont.
Pete,
Are you referring to any particular Republicans?
Nope, he must be talking about the soldiers...or, as he calls them, "rednecks."
I wasn't holding my breath, but I did think for just a minute we'd make it through a topic without Chrome Dome rehashing the tired mistaken rhetoric that makes him look so smart.
Way to go, Chrome! I need to pick apart one of your posts, misquote it, misread it, and then put those words in your mouth every time you appear. Fair enough?
Redneck tactic, indeed. You can include that from now on, smart guy.
As for Lieberman, the rest of the country is finally waking up and realizing that "staying the course" is not going to cut it.
I need to pick apart one of your posts, misquote it, misread it, and then put those words in your mouth every time you appear.
Your words, Assface...not mine. Also part of your words were "I'm not coming back here, ever, I swear I mean it this time." Seems that you have a teensy problem telling the truth or standing by your own words.
As for Lieberman, the rest of the country is finally waking up and realizing that "staying the course" is not going to cut it.
Poll: Liberman leads Lamont by 12%. Yeah, that "cut and run" approach is working wonders in deep blue CT, isn't it?
Assface; nice. Really, how old are you?
And besides, they weren't my words and you know it. The one guy standing outside his wooden shack holding a press conference to announce his frivolous law suit is a redneck. I will stand by that. Grow up, man. Really.
Not that it matters to me, Lamont is as much of a lying jackass as Lieberman is, but you'll find in November that Connecticut will not elect an independent. Chrome, you can copy and paste that quote from me and throw it in my face should the opposite miraculously happen in November. I know how much you like to quote me.
I, however, will in turn like to take this opportunity to throw something in all of your faces. You know, about all the proven links between 9/11 and Iraq that Jenn and her cohorts have so fervently tried to argue for. At any rate, this was the most newsworthy thing to come out of that press conference yesterday and none of your "liberal" MSM managed to report it. Old Chimpy got a little feisty when someone actually dared to ask a good question.
Full transcript:
BUSH: The terrorists attacked us and killed 3,000 of our citizens before we started the freedom agenda in the Middle East.
QUESTION: What did Iraq have to do with it?
BUSH: What did Iraq have to do with what?
QUESTION: The attack on the World Trade Center.
BUSH: Nothing. Except it’s part of — and nobody has suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack. Iraq was a — Iraq — the lesson of September 11th is take threats before they fully materialize, Ken. Nobody’s ever suggested that the attacks of September the 11th were ordered by Iraq.
Yea and...
Pete quoting Bush: "Nobody’s ever suggested that the attacks of September the 11th were ordered by Iraq."
Except liberals who said Bush said that.
And your point?
You do realize that the U.S. and it's allies had every right to go in and take out Saddam for violating every UN resolution and surrender agreement don't you?
The only reason it wasn't done earlier was because Clinton was in office and most of Europe was in Saddams pocket.
Taking out Saddam was necessary irrespective of the party in office or 9-11. 9-11 was an added incentive.
What is your point Petey?. Aw, shucks, I forgot, you never have a point. I have not, EVER, not one single time ever said Iraq or Saddam had a single f-ing thing to do with 9/11. Not once.So your little rant,"links between 9/11 and Iraq that Jenn and her cohorts have so fervently tried to argue for" is a sad sack of steaming cow pie.
Try again old chap.
One day, Pete, instead of slinging your sh*t about willy nilly, you might actually answer a question when addressed point blank.
And don't try, don't you even try to get out of your redneck comment, you made a nasty, nasty comment, and you know it. Stop being such a douche bag.
Nobody's trying to get out of anything, Jenn. Read what I wrote, if only for once. I owned it. I stand by it. But you can't own anything you didn't say, which Chrome will have you believe was, "All soldiers are rednecks." Let's not beat that horse anymore.
"I have not, EVER, not one single time ever said Iraq or Saddam had a single f-ing thing to do with 9/11. Not once."
VS.
"And, yes, Iraq did have something to do with 9/11." Jenn, 12/20/05
There are more, too, if you'd like, Jenn. But you'd surely like me to go back to not responding to your "point blank" questions, for they make you look rather silly.
You get feisty when you get served, don't you?
And don't try, don't you even try to get out of your redneck comment, you made a nasty, nasty comment, and you know it.
Jenn, Petey doesn't have the balls to stand by his comment that soldiers are rednecks. He tries to Kerry his way out of it, and I'm not going the eunich get away with it.
...but you'll find in November that Connecticut will not elect an independent.
Let's see: Joe lost a primary that was open to only Democrats by about 10,000 votes. He has high approval ratings among CT's Republican base and the overwhelming majority of CT's unaffiliated voter base (which makes up about 45% of all voters in the state). He also had a large number of Dems vote for him in the primary. Current polls show him with a 12% lead in a three way race.
Right..."no way" he can win!
I know how much you like to quote me.
You're an endless source of verbal diarrhea, Shithead, so getting quotable material from you is as easy as getting Bill Clinton to hump a portly intern.
Served? Served what, Brie and toast points?
Talk about out of context, try harder next time Petey, it takes a whole lot more than that to "serve" me.
Your implication is that I have implied that Iraq was directly responsible for 9/11. That I never said. My statement was about how Iraq and other terrorist regimes are all responsible in their own way for breeding 9/11 type situations.
Now you find me the quote where I said Iraq was responsible for 9/11 directly, and I will, this time, really eat my bra.
***** "Us people" are excited about democracy spreading in a land of chaos. And, yes, Iraq did have something to do with 9/11...Want to know what that was? Iraq was a bed of death, hatred, coercion and complete totalitarianism. Now, they have a chance, even civil war is better, though both Shia's and Sunni came together to vote. Son, war is never stupid, it's sad, horrible and scary. But at times necessary. Afghanistan was the start, Iraq, the logical next step....Then, we move to Iran, and then, onward, sorry, but face the facts, it's us or them. That is the rule THEY set, we are only engaging them in self defense.
"Jenn, Petey doesn't have the balls to stand by his comment that soldiers are rednecks. He tries to Kerry his way out of it, and I'm not going the eunich get away with it."
Wow, man. The absurdity of your drivel is nothing short of fantastic. Since you can't just read above, you know, where I owned my statement and stood by it, then I'll go back and find my original quote.
For the record, ladies and gentlemen: This was me on 6.1.06 in response to the guy who frivolously sued Michael Moore for $85 million.
"I think this redneck got back from Iraq without some limbs and realized he had a chance to capitalize (two years later, mind you) and is giving it a whirl while rallying the troops for the conservative agenda against liberals." Pete, 6.1.06.
There it is, folks. It really lives up to Chrome's hype, doesn't it? Now maybe you can grow up and quit your schoolyard bickering tactics.
And, yes, I know about Connecticut and I stand by my statement that the state will not elect an Independent. Copy and paste it now, so you'll have it close by.
Who's an endless source of verbal diarrhea?
It's right above this, Jenn. In case you don't want to look, here it is again:
"I have not, EVER, not one single time ever said Iraq or Saddam had a single f-ing thing to do with 9/11. Not once."
And then I showed you where you did say Iraq had something to do with 9/11.
I believe it was: "And, yes, Iraq did have something to do with 9/11."
That's all. It's pretty simple, really. There are plenty more, too. That was just the first one I came across.
I never said you said Iraq was directly responsible for 9/11. You said: "I have not, EVER, not one single time ever said Iraq or Saddam had a single f-ing thing to do with 9/11. Not once."
I simply pointed out that you had. This isn't rocket science.
But, just like Bush, who must've forgotten he's on plenty of tape, along with Cheney, Rummy and Co., linking 9/11 and Iraq. You can't erase a lie with a lie.
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
Joseph Goebbels
"I think this redneck got back from Iraq without some limbs and realized he had a chance to capitalize (two years later, mind you) and is giving it a whirl while rallying the troops for the conservative agenda against liberals." Pete, 6.1.06.
Yep, that's the statement. Anyone with half a brain (therein lies your problem) can see your contempt for the troops (or, "rednecks") in that statement. That, and you've never really said anything flattering about the soldiers before or since that statement. Therefore, I stand by my characterization that you think the soldiers are all "rednecks."
Who's an endless source of verbal diarrhea?
That would be "you", Genius. What, is that another one of those "I know you are, but what am I?" retorts to which we've become accustomed hearing from you? Hard to compete with that level of mental acumen.
Hey...didn't you promise to piss off? Yet another statement from you displaying your lack of ability to stand by your word. Shocking, I tell you!
Taken out of context, you are right. I said they had something to do with 9/11, in that their coulture breeds the types that perpetrate 9/11 type atrocities. Yup, guess you got me there Petey.
At no point did I say that Saddam or Iraq actually commited or "made" 9/11 happen. Nor did I ever say they trained the men who did it, nor did I say they financed it. What I'm trying to figure out is how you can make a statement like,"You know, about all the proven links between 9/11 and Iraq that Jenn and her cohorts have so fervently tried to argue for."
Can you find me that? All those links myself and my co-horts have been fervently arguing for Pete.
Well, folks, here's a fine display of Chrome just being Chrome.
I tried. It doesn't get laid out any clearer than I did above. At this point it's just laughable, man. You just keep on doing what you do. One day maybe you'll realize what a pansie you are.
What a terrible argument. I'll just go ahead and make it easy for you to get off: every single soldier, indeed, is a redneck. Get out your lotion and paper towels and go to town, Chrome.
Can we have a real discussion now?
Sure, Jenn.
Should we go back to the all the weapons of mass destruction you insisted upon? Or do you want to just stick to the generalizations you made about Iraq being the right choice?
You choose.
One day maybe you'll realize what a pansie you are.
Project much, Queerbait?
Can we have a real discussion now?
I don't seriously converse with moonbats, Petey, especially those who think our soldiers are "rednecks."
Still running from your promises, Dicklick?
One day maybe you'll realize what a pansie you are.
Project much, Queerbait?
Can we have a real discussion now?
I don't seriously converse with moonbats, Petey, especially those who think our soldiers are "rednecks."
Still running from your promises, Dicklick?
I stand by the WMD's. He had them. Period.
But, let's get real here Petey, my reasoning for Iraq has always been and will always remain the same, and this you can find and quote forever, because I've said it numerous times. As far as I am concerned, going into Iraq was just finishing the job we started in the first gulf war. Period. That's my reason for wanting us there. Always has been.
I beleive, actually I also made the point clear in the quote you took out of context above. "Us people" are excited about democracy spreading in a land of chaos. And, yes, Iraq did have something to do with 9/11...Want to know what that was? Iraq was a bed of death, hatred, coercion and complete totalitarianism." Saddam needed to go.
Oh, I can't help myself.... it's PANSY PETE, not pansie.
Jenn: "Oh, I can't help myself.... it's PANSY PETE, not pansie."
I kinda like "Pantie Pete"
I can accept your updated reason for going to Iraq. And, hey, I've never said that Saddam was a good guy and that Iraq never posed any danger.
My whole problem all along has been the lies about getting in there. I don't like being lied to and twisted into false support for a war when lives are in danger. Just be upfront. I don't think Americans would have been unsupportive of invading Iraq had Bush just come out and said, "look, we're taking our focus off Bin Laden to take care of this other bunch of terrorists in Iraq, including Hussein." But he insisted they were going to destroy us and were chock full of WMDs, etc ...
I'm going to give you a chance to take back you WMD statement in your last post. Do you really want to stand by that? Even your party has stepped away from that, despite 56 percent of the country still believing WMDs were found in Iraq.
So, in essence, you're right. Saddam needed to go. But we didn't have to rush in there unprepared and without a plan all the while being lied to on the strength of 9/11 support. That's a disservice to our country.
Chrome, grow up and come talk with the big people some time.
Chrome, grow up and come talk with the big people some time.
I do that here all the time. That's why you're excluded. The "big people" I talk to don't hate the troops like you do, Bitch.
Still waiting on you to keep a promise. Waiting...
No, I will not take back my statement on WMD. Saddam had years to get them hidden and moved. Then he had a few months while we were telling him our asses were coming for them. Then we gave him a finite amount of time to complete the removal of all that he had left. If I were a betting girl, (Oooppps, I am) I'd lay my money on Syria being home to what he did have left.
What he also had was plans, very clearly outlined that he intened to restart his WMD program. He just had to get the "inspectors" out. Which, I believe he was doing.
Come on Pete, does it matter, those 16 words?
Oh, and I hate to fully burst your euphoric bubble of glee, but they did find some, albeit old, WMD in Iraq, so those 56% were right.
Pantie Pete: "Should we go back to the all the weapons of mass destruction you insisted upon? Or do you want to just stick to the generalizations you made about Iraq being the right choice?"
Only the extreme Bush haters and rabid far lefters will state
vociferously that there weren't/aren't any WMD.
There are numerous accounts of Saddams WMD being secretly spirited out of Iraq into Syria.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middl...ast/
2945045.stm
What's odd, is the American MSM for the most part ignored these stories. Gee ... I thought they weren't biased.
Anyway, the bottom line is the weapons inspectors were totally useless. Saddam hindered them every step of the way and after reports of the massive bribing efforts Saddam had in place came out, would you believe anything coming from the UN?
Better yet ... who would you tend to believe, the UN, Saddam or the US? I know your answer, I just want to hear you say it.
WMD's were moved to Syria by Russian convoys weeks before the War. Saddam's giant underground bunker built by a Euro Trash company has yet to be found, WMD's could be in there and the fact Saddam had Migs buried why wouldn't he have had the same done to WMD's..
Funny, Clinton thought he had WMD's but that was okay for Lefties because it was Clinton not Bush, had there been a President Gore the fact no WMD's have yet to be found wouldn't stop the Lefties from saying there was WMD's in Iraq..
I prefer "Panty-waste Pete"!
Hey Panty-waste, follow this link, read carefully, then come back here and tell us all about how "Bush lied - People died".
Chrome... grow up.
Cursing is the crutch of the ignorant.
Nah, some of us brilliant people suffer from turrettes syndrome.
"Chrome... grow up.
Cursing is the crutch of the ignorant."
Jamie, if it's OK with you, I think I'll ignore the advice from a guy who swears that Pete isn't a liberal, and a guy who thinks that people who want to ban gross behavior are un-American DESPITE THE FACT THAT you also want to ban gross behavior...just different gross behavior that you find disgusting.
Piss off, hypocrite.
I don't mind James, he's entitled to his opinion, but Chrome,you make a very, VERY good point.
Many feel that homosexuality is a "gross", as you put it, behavior.
James thinks smoking is the worst behavior.
Who's got more rights. Smoking and sleeping with someone of the same sex are both, no matter what you say, personal behaviors. What makes one worse than the other?????
they just hating on our governor!
why ya'll hating on Kerry. y'all need to chill with all that shit. hating ass rednecks!!
Commenting by HaloScan
