This Is Not A Democracy, It's A Republic........
Ha! I heard about this on the local news yesterday. It's probably laying in the desert south of the Patton Museum, hopes deflated now that it has been replaced with the chickens that have come home to roost.
I just have to say: How anti-American to have a picture of Uncle Sam portrayed this way.
Isn't he supposed to represent the father of our country? By representing him in this way, aren't they really saying that they AREN'T proud to be Americans?
WE DEMAND EVERY CAPITALIST SLAVE PLANTATION SHUT DOWN TOMORROW FOR THE GREAT ANNIVERSARY!
As a Stalinist, for me tomorrow is Christmas, New Years, Halloween and Groundhog Day all wrapped up in one!
RUFUS, A, ELROY...SOLIDARITEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Waters kicks KKKapitalist ass!
Huh?
The Insane One is talking about May Day - the anniversary of a socialist uprising.
She is, of course, in solidarity with the socialists that are trying to take over the country.
Yeah - and she correctly picked out every socialist on this blog. She at least knows her own kind.
Wit she is SMELLING her own kind. They all smell like SHIT w diarrhea spewing from their mouths, lol.
Well, Nam - what do you expect from a bunch of basement dwellers? I DO agree they all talk a bunch of crap and have shite for brains!
Acuialy the demacrats should realy replace the donkey with the pig since thier always voting for pork projects
In all fairness, there is a good share of pork being produced by the RINOs also.
Roger Waters "kicks KKKapitalist ass"?
Must be kicking his own ass, as he's making a boat-load of money.
Ah, the disappeared, but not yet the banned. Just like the old days.
Oh fuck off you half wit moron. I haven't disappeared a single one of your worthless piece of shit comments.
I just put YOUR fake name on them Shawm so quit lying.
Now, why would you do that?
Because it's my party.
OK - it's not like it's a secret, or you haven't done that before. Do you only reveal the real names of liberals?
NO, and the only comments of your I deleted were your comments about our troops, that were vile and worthless. Pretty much like all your worthless comments.
NO, and the only comments of your I deleted were your comments about our troops, that were vile and worthless.
WHAT??? But, but, but...I thought she "loved" the troops! That's what she said, anyway.
Pretty much like all your worthless comments.
"All" being the operative word! 
I support the troops. Delete that.
Do you support the efforts in Afghanistan? I already know your stance on Iraq.
Yes, I do, and I always have. But I think it's been bungled by the administration, and I think it's been thwarted by the war in Iraq.
The answer is yes. I'd also prefer we get that fuck-face Bin Laden. Remember him? I think the problem is Packistan. And Jenn knows I've been saying that all along. Mushareff is no friend of the United States. And as for the Bush's well, there's no degree of separation between them and the Bin Ladens, not to mention the Saudis. But what do you want from an oil man?
Been to the pump lately?
"Been to the pump lately?"
Yes ... wonderful plan those democrats had for getting fuel prices down.
By the way, don't you think it's time we drilled our own on and off shore reserves?
Been to the pump lately?
a
Yeah, a-hole (I'm stealin' that, Na-buddy). So, explain to us AGAIN how this war is for oil? The glut we're STEALING would actually bring prices down.
"I'd also prefer we get that fuck-face Bin Laden"
Actually, I'd rather we exterminate the Muslim Brotherhood. Bin Laden is probably dead anyway, if he isn't, he's rotting in a cave.
Show of hands folks who here thinks Pakistan is a true friend? Oh no one.. thanks. Fucking Mudkitty always twisting words and putting words in others mouths.
What do you want - Bush vetos every dem bill. And when he signs a so-called bi-partisan bill, he signs it with a signing statement, negating the bill.
Let me see...Bush in office 7 years...republicans in control of congress for 12 years. Dems in "control" (quotes thanks to Lieberman) for 2 years. Do the math. Yeah that makes sense. Blame the democrats.
What ever happened to the republicans being the party of responsibility? As in taking responsibility?
Oh come on Jenn - I've been bitching about Packistan for years.
Witless - I DARE you to site one time I ever said the war is for oil. Talk about putting words in ones mouth.
Taking responsibility for what? Oil prices? Who the fuck determines the price of a barrel of crude? Bush?
The dems have been in control for two years and you're telling me Bush is so powerful they can't get anything done? Well, fuck ... let's amend the Constitution again and get Bush a third term. Who cares who controls Congress if the Prez has that much power.
She didn't say you ... she was speaking of the left's assertion that we're in Iraq for oil.
What do you want - Bush vetos every dem bill. And when he signs a so-called bi-partisan bill, he signs it with a signing statement, negating the bill. a
Ok, clueless. Explain THAT! There is NO SUCH THING AS A SIGNING STATEMENT!!!! Nor is there any such thing as a line-item veto. Both are UnConstitutional and would require an amendment to the Constitution. He vetos them because he can't live with the tag-alongs attached. He HAS to either sign the whole thing or veto the WHOLE thing.
Damn! And you call ME witless!
What do you want - Bush vetos every dem bill. And when he signs a so-called bi-partisan bill, he signs it with a signing statement, negating the bill.
Let me see...Bush in office 7 years...republicans in control of congress for 12 years. Dems in "control" (quotes thanks to Lieberman) for 2 years. Do the math. Yeah that makes sense. Blame the democrats.
What ever happened to the republicans being the party of responsibility? As in taking responsibility?
a | 05.02.08 - 3:44 pm | #
Date Line 2006-
http://uspolitics.about.com/b/20...year-
record.htm
"Bush Veto Action Sets 200 Year Record
Updated 23 March [2006]
It is a momentous week in Presidential history: President Bush now ranks behind Thomas Jefferson as serving the longest without exercising President authority to veto Congressional legislation. Although George Will says the magic date was Monday, 20 March, both USA Today and Bloomberg report the mark as today, the 23rd."
Mud, This is why you don't have any credibility. You spout liberal talking points you pick up from sights full of uneducated morons, believing them as fact without researching the truth.
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0...a/
A0801767.html
President Bush has a total of 9 vetoes, on of which was overturned. That's a far cry from F.D. Rosevelt's 635 or Grover Cleveland's 414, wouldn't you say?In fact, let's look at the qty of vetoes since Kennedy, shall we?
To date:
President: Congress: V: PV: OT:
Kennedy 87th–88th 12 9 21 —
L. B. Johnson 88th–90th 16 14 30 —
Nixon 91st–93rd 26 17 43 7
Ford 93rd–94th 48 18 66 12
Carter 95th–96th 13 18 31 2
Reagan 97th–100th 39 39 78 9
G.H.W. Bush1 101st–102nd 29 15 44 1
Clinton 103rd–106th 36 1 37 2
G. W. Bush 107th–108th 0 — 0 —
G. W. Bush 109th 1 — 1 —
G. W. Bush 110th 7 1 8 1
In fact, one of the biggest complaints of the GOP has been his lack of willingness to use the veto.
Sorry, V=Veto, PV=Pocket Veto, OT=Overturned
"There is no such thing as a signing statement." Really? Ok, we'll leave it at that. (Sigh and eye roll.)
Oh brother.
*****
G - all 9 vetos have occurred after the '06 elections. Get it?
Sorry again, it's early. The third of four numbers is the total combined qty of Vetoes.
And the darn things didn't line up like I set them; stupid haloscan.
No a (sighs) there really IS no signing statement. Nor is there a line-item veto - that thing they want in place to sign what you want and throw out the pork you don't. That's why you end up with bizarro-land things attached to defense budgets and what-not.
Witless, now you're embarrassing yourself.
Just let you fingers do the walking with google.
LOL! You really are dumber than a bag of dirt aren't you?
Right back at you! YOU prove there is a line item veto. Or a signing statement. Go ahead - I want links.
Dang! I almost feel sorry for you - almost!
There is no line item veto, and I never said there was. But you are more of a fool than I ever thought if you keep insisting there's no such thing as a signing statement. It's Bushies specialty. Read. Something other than right wing bullshit.
Prove it.
chirp.... chirp....
http://www.coherentbabble.com/si...ts/
TOCindex.htm
Even I can't believe you guys are this ignorant.
Watch this post (with link) disappear.
THAT is what you are talking about? You really ARE an idiot. You made this "signing statement sound like he made changes to a Bill he signed negating same Bill - to which I called BS. He either has the power to sign the whole thing or veto the whole thing - he doesn't have the power to change a Bill.
Basically, what you've provided is his comments on why he's signed or vetoed a Bill, provided for historical context. Soething all presidents have done.
Thanks for providing the link, bot. I'm just sorry it shows your truly frightening lack of understanding regarding our legislative and executive branch procedures.
If you really want to know how the prez can f-up a bill that's been passed (i.e. the "real" fence bill) it's called defunding, or re-directing the funding. They are VERY good at this and it IS a poke in the eye of the American people.
*go witness*
*go witness*
Exactly - his signing statements always amount to the concept that as an executive, he doesn't have to adhere to the letter of the law. Just like when Nixon said on live television "if the president does it, it's not illegal."
Look Witless, you were the one who said there is no such thing. LOlllll! By the way, they're not called veto statements, they're signing statements.
You're understanding of the English language is nil and your understanding of our executive, legislative and judicial branches of government is even less.
Stop trying to play with the big kids (even though you're older than dirt) you don't have the IQ.
Why she's only banned 3 people in her life.
Four would be awesome.
****Actually of the three ever banned, that includes psycho nutjob kitty.*
Edited By Siteowner
2 Visitors Online
Commenting by HaloScan
