|
|
|
Keeping track of one Ward Churchill is boring enough, so I gotta ask: Where are you getting the idea that Dunbar-Ortiz is gay?
jwpaine |
Homepage |
03.22.07 - 5:59 pm | #
|
|
You know, I just said that because of lookism. I think I'll take it back now.
jgm |
Homepage |
03.22.07 - 6:12 pm | #
|
|
Lookist!
jwpaine |
Homepage |
03.22.07 - 6:22 pm | #
|
|
Thanks for changing "lesbian" to "female", thereby ruining the only semi-decent snark I managed to write all day. Thanks so freaking much.
Lookist pig.
jwpaine |
Homepage |
03.22.07 - 6:56 pm | #
|
|
Yeah, Ward's been pretty much a drone for decades now. What fascinates me is how uniform and prevalent his type of thinking is--the arrogance, the malignant narcissism, the moral preening, the sneering lies and the threatened (and boasted-of) violence. It's like reading the Case Book of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders:
"Louise Larkin is a pale, stooped woman of 39 years, whose childlike face is surrounded by scraggly blond braids tied with pink ribbons. . ."
or,
"Nick, a 26-year-old, single, grocery store clerk complained: 'I have a problem with shit.'"
You just got to figure out what the diagnosis is.
jgm |
Homepage |
03.22.07 - 6:59 pm | #
|
|
"Evil skank" will have to do for now. Of course, if we find that she is indeed a lesbian (NTTAWWT), we will go back to the original description.
Not central to my thinking, you understand, but this is as good a place as any to note that I have absolutely no money or assets whatsoever. None. What. So. Ever. You know those Capital One Vikings? They've gone back to raping and pillaging (ooh!) just to collect what I owe on my Capital One card.
jgm |
Homepage |
03.22.07 - 7:29 pm | #
|
|
omg you are going to take on all the the ethnic studies program one by one? jesus i need to build an ark what is it 20 cubits by 40 cubits by 60 cubits according to cosby or was that the bible...there might not be much here by the time you get back. by the way all this wardifying has not brought out snaps..i have been busy what happened to her?
dougie houser |
03.22.07 - 8:35 pm | #
|
|
dougie:
Don't want to paint with too broad a brush, but you've been around them so I'll ask: why is every ethnic studies department awash with scumbags and pathological liars? It's uncanny.
Snapple's been keeping up with Ward on her own blog.
jgm |
Homepage |
03.23.07 - 12:31 am | #
|
|
From the way you've been described, most women would appear "mannish" and probably threatening to you. I'm not surprised Ortiz looks masculine, due to your advanced age, small stature and high pitched voice. I got a good laugh hearing you tucked tail and slunk out of the room when Whitmer spoke to you. You pitiful, little old man.
fisherman |
03.23.07 - 2:54 am | #
|
|
Before you go, fisherman, would you turn me over? I don't want to get bedsores.
jgm |
Homepage |
03.23.07 - 10:24 am | #
|
|
These kids today, with their clothes and their hair!
jwpaine |
Homepage |
03.23.07 - 10:56 am | #
|
|
i'm sorry, kids. i've been out of the country a long time, so you'll have to help me. when did calling someone a skank, or a lesbian for that matter, prove itself a valid response to an argument that had nothing to do (so far as i can see, and i did make sure to check the photos, thanks) with sexual promiscuity or inclination? calling nasty sexual violence on somebody for something they say or do is one (albeit dodgy-as-fuck but yet effective in its way or folks wouldn't keep raspy-mentioning it) thing, but maligning a person's character (or trying to), responding to her words with words that aren't even insulting when we get right down to the bullshit parochial-schoolyard moral judgments and worse that they're founded on... what IS that? so you think she looks like a lesbian (what?!) and she's a skank because you don't agree with her? man, if that's still what it comes down to then we're as bad as what the international media says. speaking as a skanky lesbian american, i've gotta say i'm really not impressed. but then of course my type's probably not who you're speaking to. who is your schoolboy choir, exactly, mr. man? what kind of male adolescent utopia, exactly are you people trying to build?
laurie |
03.23.07 - 12:13 pm | #
|
|
Laurie,
You're right, lesbian skank is perhaps not a good response to her argument. How about this: How can she call herself a feminist when she actively supports a form of government (socialism as practiced by Cuba, Sandanistan-Nicaragua, etc), that has NEVER been one to support women's rights? The woman is a fraud. How many women generals does Fidel have on his payroll? Why isn't there a woman leading Cuba instead of Fidel's brother? This woman is simply someone who thinks it's okay for members of her political ideology to act with violence and be above the law but not for others. Much like Ward Churchill, this woman is the kind of "activist" who has no qualms about threatening th lives of others or making implied threats of violence, but would immediately run to the police and press charges were anyone to do the same to her. Given her hypocrisy (both in the states she supports vs. those she demonizes and in my presumption regarding her actions if someone turned the tables on her), mocking her is not at all out of the question.
goblin-jack |
03.23.07 - 12:43 pm | #
|
|
Laurie:
You're right. However, "lesbian," where it was, was merely a descriptor, not a putdown. What I did was make an assumption sans evidence--bad, but not homophobic.
Also, by calling D-O a "skank," I brought myself down to--well, not nearly Try-Works' level, but closer than I want to be. I'll get rid of it.
jgm |
Homepage |
03.23.07 - 2:05 pm | #
|
|
Oh, I got rid of "evil," too, not because I don't think D-O is, but because it looked funny sitting there all by its lonesome.
jgm |
Homepage |
03.23.07 - 2:11 pm | #
|
|
Goblin J, mockery is always called for with these people, of course, but I screwed up. I did not, however, call D-O a "lesbian skank."
jgm |
Homepage |
03.23.07 - 2:44 pm | #
|
|
I must admit that I've done it in the past myself...assumed someone was a lesbian because of mannish looks...and been completely wrong. I am currently a strong advocate of no assumptions. But it's a fairly small mistake, don't you think? Hardly worth the "testosterone-spill" (as Laurie called it at Pirate Ballerina) reaction over at Tryworks. And it's absolutely nothing compared to crap spewed there.
Drunkawife |
03.24.07 - 7:59 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|