|
|
|
You like to use that expression... "that's real data" a lot.
Like you really have somehthing there.
Some real knowledge you can make predictions with.
Balderdash...you collect some information that fits your assumption and cackle over your "real data".
It will be interesting to see what kind of job you get when potential employers look at the scientific work and "real data" you produced on this blog.
What a waste.
Steve |
01.30.06 - 4:16 pm | #
|
|
"Also, respondents were assured anonymity, but there he is, identifying respondents."
What he says is "every reply will be treated as anonymous." When he identifies people, he's pointing out public statements that they've already made. So I don't think this is a fair criticism (though you still have plenty of other criticisms left that are fair...). 
Kevin W. Parker |
01.30.06 - 4:29 pm | #
|
|
Perhaps, though the fact that they responded to the survey is broken by identifying the respondents.
Josh |
Homepage |
01.30.06 - 5:00 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|