I'm going to be harsh about this - but I wonder what this person's actions were last year when Terry Schiavo was left to suffer and die. Was she also trying her best to make contacts to save her? Seems it's a bit different for the left wingers when the shoe is on the other foot.
Of course I don't want this to happen, but I just had to ask.
Be harsh. It's easy for you to not see it from the viewpoint of the family. Andrea Clark does not have significant brain damage as Terri Schiavo had, and it is Clark's families right to understand the differences of those cases.
This is not about politics, this is about a human life. Andrea knows what is happening to her and has the ability to communicate on her own behalf when her drugs have worn off. Do not confuse these cases or the politics here. There are no politics only Andrea's life. Use your energy elsewhere to save her, rather than berate her family.
I am not being harsh - I value all human life. Terry was a human life too and hers was taken from her. You don't think she could feel pain? As I said before, when the shoe is on the other foot it seems to fit better for some strange reason and make perfect sense. It goes something like this: I stood by and they took and deaf person, I stood by and they took the lame person, I stood by and they took the blind person, I stood by and they took the elderly, I stood by and they took the little children, I stood by and they took the innocent and then they came for me butthere was no one left to speak on my behalf.
Who are we, just mortal humans, to judge who should live and who should die. That's what both of these cases are about. My belief is there is only one person who judges me and calls me when it's my time to join him. It's not up to some doctor because he/she feels my pain, it's not up to my family because I am an inconvenience, it's not up to my government because I am a burden!!
Commenting by HaloScan
