I reserve the right to kill my toddler under certain extreme crcmstances!
(Sorry -- couldn`t resist.) 
Anyone who would say such a thing cannot be trusted with a child. They obviously believe in murdering children, so how can they be trusted with a child? They cannot.
I checked out your Web site, "Reverend." Anyone who calls Paul Hill a hero is in no position to be giving out parenting advice.
The sticker also assumes that people are not trusting women with choices. This is utterly false, and is a "strawman" argument. The pro-life movement honors choice as much as anyone. It simply distinguishes choice which impacts only the person choosing, and choice which benefits one while harming another.
The argument of abortion is based on individual values and beliefs. I personally think that people should display a certain level of competency before having children. You certainly have to do so when you adopt children or even pets, why not before you actually bring new life into the world? Well..it's undemocratic. To make people register for access to parental rights (of their own children) is to deny and limit the rights of the poor, uneducated, and poorly equipped. I would argue that abortion, regardless of my personal beliefs is the same way. It is undemocratic to force a woman to bring an unborn child to full term. By doing so you're infringing upon the rights of those with limited access to healthcare, contraceptives, education and basic means.
K. Ferris,
Your assertion that it is undemocratic to prohibit abortion shows that you have no clue what the term "undemocratic" means.
Anyone could just as easily assert, "It's undemocratic for a woman to take away the rights of her unborn child by having an abortion."
Here's a suggestion. Take some time to actually understand the prolife position before trying to make an argument against it.
Commenting by HaloScan
