It always does. Happens frequently. But it's spelled differently: "revelation." (the individual experience of a revolution). 
Yea, but...I'm attempting to get the Hottentots to put down their other ideas of revolution of the old-fashioned kind.
Ya mean group revolution thingys? I guess ya gotta start spelling it differently. "Revolution" sounds like cluster-fuck to me.
It is.
It's also the only thing I think they understand, hence the use of the word.
Ya dig?
I think I attempted that with my books somewhat, hence the confusion ... when you use THEIR words to reach, you end up being understood in THEIR terms ... with predictable results. People call it "using language normally" but all it does is continue the status quo. They will always "hear what you say," not what you mean (unless you say what you mean, instead of what you think they will understand). Ya dig?
There's always that.
But how do you hold an old revolution between the ears?
Sorry, not understanding the question ... you mean "hold" as in "stage" or "make" a revelation within the mind of another human being? Once you change the word from cluster-fuck, er, "revolution" to "revelation" then it puts a different twist on things ... and opens possibilities ... dunit? Works for me.
Should have been:
"How do you stage a traditional, old-style revolution (guns and all) between the ears?"
Individuals pull the triggers of individual guns upon their individual responsibility and kill individual scum. It's a revelation! An old-style revolution is a cluster-fuck ... under the command of Errol Flynn ... and it changes nuttin. Never has, mostly because of the way it is organized, qua group effort - to result in group rule.
Commenting by HaloScan
