Your infinitely reasonable suggestion to judge these blogs on their content (vs. popularity or affiliated employees) is CLEARLY a transparent bid for your sympathetic readers to crush MY blog into dust!

I am ON TO YOU, Kami Watson Huyse! Do you hear me! I see you for what you ARE!

Love,
Todd
Todd Defren | Homepage | 08.25.08 - 11:49 am | #

Kami!

Thanks for the kind words and for the links to the others' sites as well.

Nobody is more surprised than me that I'm still in this thing. Hope folks are finding some new voices out there.

Thanks, Todd, for the twitter link.
Lally | Homepage | 08.25.08 - 12:17 pm | #

Todd; The problem with your reasoning is that my readers are often readers of yours as well. In fact, I am pretty sure you have more readers. But, I am very grateful for anyone who takes the time to read and comment on this blog. Thanks!

Lally; You have a great Ohio crowd to back you. I love how you write in stories and parables. I was glad to find your blog.

Kami
Kami Huyse | Homepage | 08.25.08 - 1:01 pm | #

Kami,

You are doing exactly what I wished PRWeek had done. The contest is beyond stupid (good luck by the way), just naming blogs and expecting people to vote without putting a little effort in to give context and credentials. It's the good content I want -- from the bloggers, and from PRWeek. Thanks for doing it right.
Doug Haslam | Homepage | 08.27.08 - 10:38 pm | #

Doug; Thanks for the kudos, they have now added three posts for each contestant to the voting site, for which I am extremely pleased. Content rules, IMHO.
Kami Huyse | Homepage | 08.28.08 - 12:28 pm | #