It sounds like the NY Times is trying to make people think that the leadership of the Anglican Church compromised.I didn't see anything that looked like a compromise other than they are waiting a few years to implement their agenda. I didn't see any quotes from the traditionalists and for me that is telling. Here is a link to another article that seems to think that their wasn't a compromise.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/
dam...rotestant_again
Commenting by HaloScan
