|
|
|
Indeed! We cannot allow them to get the public's eye away from Rove. You are absolutely correct about the Republican noise machine. I wish we had someone in the media who was as well listened to as that ass, Rush.
oldwhitelady |
Homepage |
07.19.05 - 10:24 pm | #
|
|
I have a feeling that Bush hasn't asked Karl "turd blossom" Rove what his involvement in the leak was. I think he has a pretty good hunch, but doesn't want to know for sure. If Turd Blossom was to admit to the President that he had revealed sensitive classified information to a reporter, Bush would be obligated to fire him.
And yes, I agree wholeheartedly that we can't allow Bush's latest diversion to indefinitely deflect attention from Turdgate. While it is important to have a dialog about a Supreme Court nomination, it's also important that sleazeball tactics by White House political advisers not be forgotten and go unpunished.
Jesse |
Homepage |
07.20.05 - 1:01 am | #
|
|
Right on, kissfan - we have to keep our eye on the ball on this one. Realistically speaking, this Roberts is not the worst guy (or gal) they could throw at us, so - back to the issue at hand - Rovergate!
As a long-time sideman, I was told early on to 'keep your eye on the money' - meaning whatever clueless idiot you happen to be backing up...that works for me right about now.
Alicia |
Homepage |
07.20.05 - 11:23 am | #
|
|
Hey Jesse,
A while back I tried to visit your site but I got a message saying the server couldn't be found. I got it a couple days in a row. Did you have some issues?
Glad to see you back, though.
kissfan |
Homepage |
07.20.05 - 1:49 pm | #
|
|
Yeah, I let my domain registration expire accidentally. It's up and running now, but I haven't really updated in a while. Too busy with other things.
Jesse |
Homepage |
07.20.05 - 2:21 pm | #
|
|
"we have to be right one hundred percent of the time, and the enemy only has to be right one time"
Man, I can't believe Dubya is still using that old nugget. Obviously, we are not right one-hundred percent of the time, or we would be spreading our Homeland Security funds a little smarter.
The way it is now, Montana gets the same amount as New York, Florida, Texas or California. I'm not saying there won't be a terrorist attack in Montana or Wyoming, but one bomb might kill one person, a coyote and an imaginary Jack-a-lope. Of course, the neighbors five miles away would probably hear the blast echo across the land and hop on their horse to check it out.
I think it's ridiculous. We could spread that money out and better defend our docks, chemical plants, nuclear power plants, etc. Let's put the money where it is most needed.
Sorry, I get a little edgy about this when I think about it too much.
Robert Rouse |
Homepage |
07.21.05 - 1:54 am | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|