Please don't type in all CAPS, it's the equivalent to YELLING, let alone hard to read, thank you.
Dude,
The problem is that you generate that anti kurd sentiment. Just go to kurdmedia and look at the forums, you people hate evrybody, even your masters the americans. I believe I have seen your name spread hateful remarks towards arabs, turks , persians. Now have you heard of Newton's third law? You don't expect people to just sit back and get abused by you rascist, hatefilled people.
But as always
"min 6eezik noofee il dayana"
Iraqi, I have one quesiton, why Turks, Iraqis, Syrians, and Iranians get (intimidated) when Kurds ask for their self-determination-rights ?
Dude,
The problem is that nobody wants to lose any land...Kurds get intimidated and abuse people (to put it mildly)when they call for self determination within the 3 Iraqi northern provinces. You have killed turkomen and ethnically cleansed assyrians(the original owners of the land) because they want from you, what you want from Iraq. The question is, why is it 7alal 3aliakoom to call for self determination and 7aram for other to demanded ethinicites within the same land?
I for one support your seperation, so that Iraqis can look for a more harmoniuos and peaceful existance.As for your lot You will just self explode once you have your independece. the 90's speaks for itself.
BTW, Kurdo, that's "friends", not "freinds". 
Good fences make good neighbours.
Nice site, tho I wish you had more to say for yourself and less to quote from media. Why can't Kurds and Arabs just live together peacefully? Iraqi brings up a good point, if you do have your own country, how will you protect yourself from Syria, Turkey and Iran? Furthermore, if you're not interested in oil- just peace- why do you want oil-rich Kerkuk, dominated by Turkmen?
I hope you don't want any part of Iraq to start your Kurdistan, because the U.S.A. will demand the borders of Iraq stay the same for at least the next 50 years, then it will be Iraqi's postion. If I were kurdish, I would embrace the democratic system that is trying to take shape in Iraq, were you won't have to worry about geneocide and restriction of faith.
Kurdo thought you might find this interesting
http://www.healingiraq.com/
also would you support a federal state with the present borders in iraq
alan
The problem that Iraq faces is not the rule of the majority, but rather to make sure that the minorities are still protected! Having majority rule is easy: have one-person-one-vote elections tomorrow.
But, if that was done, what would likely happen? the Shiites of the South would take over Iraq and likely subject both the Sunnis and the Kurds to discrimination. That will, in turn, create a civil war in which both minorities fight the majority until another totalitarian dictator takes over. So, we will be back to where we started from.
to be continued...
continued
In the U.S. constitution (with all its warts) that delicate balancing act is accomplished via the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances. Iraq needs to develop a system like that to succeed. The Kurds need to feel that they are invested in the success of Iraq or they will make sure that Iraq fails. If the solution is to separate the Kurds into a Kurdistan, and have the other provinces remain Iraq, is for the Iraqis to decide. But certainly, it should be done later, after the situation has calmed down and not in the heat of the moment where everyone call each other angry names.
Brian H,
It's "neighbor", not "neighbour".
But since you will no doubt continue the misspelling, here are some of my unused "u's": uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu.
Feel free to insert them into any words you think may need them.
Ciao!
"Kurds are very different in culture, language, thinking and in a landscape at odds with the rest of the country."
Ho bloody hum. You want a government that imposes a Kurdish culture, language and way thinking in Northern Iraq? In that case, go to Hell, because it's not human liberty for the Kurdish people you're after, but a government that punishes people or bans, restricts, demonizes and destroys anything that is not "Kurdish".
If the protection of the Individual Rights for all people within Iraq's borders was the sole purpose of Baghdad's future government, would you ~still~ be fighting for Kurdish independence? If so, why?
At the moment I think you're just another dime-a-dozen nationalist, with no more interest in individual liberty than someone from the PLO.
"[...] and way thinking in Northern Iraq?" should have been "[...] and way of thinking in Northern Iraq?".
BK: It's spelled "neighbour" in every English speaking country except the U.S. -- the U.S. changed the spellings of many words from the original British spellings to simplify.
Now, on topic - I do agree that there is too much mixture of populace to have a separate country of Kurdistan. But there should be some special acknowledgment and reparation for crimes committed against the Kurds when the country's constitution gets finalized.
Mixing of races only really works in western countries for some reason, and its taken us centries to get it to work as good as it does now.
The kurds have thier reason to be as paranoid as they are, last time they had a good chance for freedom they were left out in the cold alone by thier "allies" (US).
Off topic: Old european invaders of America gave disease infected blankets to native American tribes to ethnicly clense entire area's. Iraqi's dropped nerve gas on Kurdish cities to ethnicly cleanse entire area's. We no longer say jack shit about the micromanagement of indian reservations, Maybe the Iraqi's should shut thier pie-holes about how the kurds are managing thier territories.
Tina, given that neither the Iraqi nor Kurdish people had any choice in what Saddam did to either population, who should be made to pay reparations and why?
Commenting by HaloScan
