I admire your sense of decency with regard to the young woman. I have little sympathy for her. If you are going to run with the big dogs there is a good chance you'll get bit.
How about we do things the right way, Laer. A candidate poses a question and then people respond to it on YouTube. That is the right way to do it.
I love how we have changed from a discussion of the issues to attacking the possible political bent of the questioners. Does it make the question any more or less valid if the person asking is a Democrat or Republican?
Our politicians, particularly those seeking the Presidency, should take questions from all sides. One of the main complaints people have against Dubbya is that he lives in an echo chamber, choosing to only address favorable audiences, like big moneyed interests or active duty military.
The internet is littered with stories of how the White House actively removes people with differing viewpoints from the audiences he addresses.
We should not care who asks the question, but we should care what the answer is.
R
Next time take the time to read whay I say, R. I said there's no problem with people from either party asking questions; the problems come when other campaigns infiltrate the system, or when there is dishonesty by the questioner.
R, the "White House" isn't a "he." Learn to tell the difference between inanimate objects and human beings. Your bias is obvious.
Laer, Kerr isn't a General outside of California. He retired as a Col. in the Cal. Army National Guard. The "General" appellation was conferred upon him at retirement as an honorary rank, not valid outside of the state. Look here:
http://www.humanevents.com/artic...le.php?
id=23698
He could potentially get in trouble for representing himself as a general.
Holy patooties. Thanks for that.
Commenting by HaloScan
