I think you've got next week's candidate for the Weasel Watching contest.
By the way, Naomi, a schoolmate of mine, always was a pompous idiot.
Was that unthinkable enough for you? Apparently not:
Actually it was unthinkable for them, since they never gave it any thought and never will.
A well-managed defeat would be more likely to boost U.S. credibility.
These people are the dumb cogs of the corrupt bureacrats, Laer.
The shrewd strategy would be to hold out carrots and sticks
These people don't know what a fauking stick is, Laer.
By the way, Naomi, a schoolmate of mine, always was a pompous idiot.
Bookworm | Homepage | 06.21.07 - 12:58 pm | #
Now that's funny. I remember you said something to that effect about Naomi (or someone else in your schools).
A blast to the past, of social circles and friends which now... is more or less the same.
A dollar to a donut? You're dating yourself. I, too, remember five cent donuts and twenty cent gasoline.
Absence of a "winner" does not prove anything. In war, its easy for everyone to lose.
Only if both sides are incompetent. And that was actually true for Vietnam. Certainly the political masters inside the US were just as mendacious as the ones that eventually won in Vietnam.
you are a good man
Commenting by HaloScan
