Sultry Suzy Carbone and Catty Catherine Deveny for PM and Deputy PM. What a team! The Aged rule the world!
Ritchie's most serious crime is that she is an extremly good looking and popular woman,on the other hand Deveny is pig-ugly and is popular only with other social cripples(aka Readers of The Age).
Deveny is jealous.
Deveney the Hutt could never stand on equal terms with a fine woman like Ritchie. No wonder the cheap slag is spewing her predictable hatred.
I think you miss the point andrew. Catherine is not having a go at Ms Ricjie but at the Logies which allow mysogynists like those on the Footy Show to win an award and give the biggest prize to a someone who probably only won because she was a 'stayer'who finally retired from a cushy job.
I love Deveny's artciles.
Always make me laugh.
She is a complete nutter.
She should not be taken seriously
She once said woman who changes their names for marrage is the same as slavery - Sounds like the word of a dyke
Curly, but she attacked Ritchie quite directly. She's just a jealous bitch.
Yes, Kate is quite unlike Deveny. Kate showers daily, is intelligent, articulate and has a real job.
I thought it was funny how Deveny randomly puts in the middle of the article 'and some girls' schools still have dresses as the uniform. Why?'
I love how it's so random and unconnected to anything in the rest of the article.
Still not sure who is more of a nutter. Deveny or Hardy.
At least Hardy can actually write.
One can only imagine how that repulsive harridan Deveney seethes with envy, at Kate's beauty and talent. Only a newspaper as dysfunctional as The Age would give her a column to air that resentment.
Remember people we are talking about the Logies here not the Nobel peace prize, I have to agree with Deveny though Richie is hardly inspiring shes insipid, and tha "galah" event as i call is not noteworthy in the international arena 20 years in a soap opera is an achievement in sheer persistence ,not talent.I hate to shatter all your lovely right wing boys fragile egos on what womens rights are and what constitutes talent but it aint just a pretty face in a pretty (ugly)dress that makes the cover of tv week , wow! inspiring (not)
Has the Age broken new ground in creative endeavour, challenged outmoded cultural stereotypes or questioned the human condition? Is the Age brave? Are they smart? Are they funny?
Are they well regarded journalists of the highest candor or just level pegging with a local news rag.
Remember Kylie started out as just the girl next door
20 years on a soap opera is ground breaking because we can all relate to the stuff that happens on home and away and neighbours nobody lives next door to wogs , or disabled people or druggies so it really challenges stereotypes.TV week the barometer of TV tripe is held in more esteem on this website because everything written here is just a reactionary , and repetetive repertoire of andrews pet dislikes ie the age , jaspan ,lefties blah blah blah.Now thats groundbreaking and cutting edge challenging..or just rants...getting stale
Catherine Deveny is an ugly mole. This is just jealousy on her part. Bitch.
CATHERINE F__K OFF!
No, Deveny is relevant, her piece on the footy show is a standout and is indicative of the misogynistic culture in football today thanks to the likes of sam newman and other wankers parading as sports journalists ...the show rubbishes women and puts footy players on an undeserving pedastool ,look at how many footballers are shining examples these days and coping ... role models yeah right not for my kids ???At least Deveny is not scared to pull punches on the puerile crap something youre too scared to do andrew.
How does this nutter get column space in a broadsheet.
How does a blog, which started off as a lively attack on the boorish and misogynist rubbish dished out by Newman and Buswell, turn into yet another example of boorishness and misogyny? Deveney's linking of these two revolting characters was sharply made, and the article was well worth the read. Who cares about some soapie. I have never even watched the show. Just look again at the language used to attack Deveny. Newman/Buswell would be proud!
Why does the MSM continue to promote the dreggiest of Leftists? What happened to the days when Leftists were intellectual leaders? It is simply mindboggling that Leftist Luvviesphere denizens can spend so much time stalking Janet and Miranda. I suppose even they are ashamed of Deveney.
What has happened to Melbourne that this dopey Deveney bint has become the Luvvies' sage? She would do well to address the questions she asked of Kate Ritchie to herself.
Has Catherine Deveney broken new ground in creative endeavour, challenged outmoded cultural stereotypes or questioned the human condition? Is she brave? Is she smart? Is she funny? No, she’s been an illiterate op-ed bloviating Luvvie for 20 years. And she’s certainly NOT pretty. What a pill.
Well said John Greenfield! Deveney's an ersatz Greer, with all of the venom but none of the originality.
Ritchie is a pioneer, she's had a sex-tape on the internet since the late 90's, she beat Paris Hilton by a good 5 years.
Commenting by HaloScan
