Use a spell checker man!
As a rabid anti-semite myself of course, according to ADL definition, I should not want six million Jews leaving Israel and returning to their countries of origin. I should be happy that they all leave my country and are contained in one place. But I'm not, I want them to disperse and come back. they are living a vicious lie in a country they stole, and only keep through horrific violence and America's big stick.
It's almost as if my big problem is the state of Israel itself, not the religion of it's inhabitants.
"those fighting Israel" know it very well. AP is mostly read by those who do not fight Israel.
I hope not, the new South Africa flag reminds me of a pair of colourful (not coloured of course) Y-fronts.
"AP editors are unethical pieces of shit."
How about Jewish Chronicle editors and commentators? Here's Alex Brummer (he's the Finance Editor of the UK's Daily Mail- is that AP?), the Jewish Chronicle's media commentator on Norman Finkelstein:
[Norman] Finkelstein has described American Jews as “parasites” and calls Holocaust survivors “frauds and hucksters” who have exploited the Shoah for their own gains.
And this in the same article:
What is harder to justify is Hari’s use of discredited figures like the historian Ilan Pappe and the Holocaust revisionist Norman Finkelstein to justify the positions he takes. Pappe, as Jacobson notes, has been questioned at every turn by fellow historians. Finkelstein’s views have been tested in the High Court in London and found wanting.
He's making out that Finkelstein, the son of two holocaust survivors, is a holocaust denier and he's trying to have his readers confuse him, with the reference to the High Court, with David Irving.
This guy Brummer has a good bit of form for this sort of thing, but this is the worst example.
"In this debate some credit must go to the Independent. It not only allowed Hari to embarrass himself in public ..."
What a hoot.
The problem for them is that the case against Israel is now in the public domain as never before and most people feel that there is at least something not quite right about Israel. Israel has blown all its holocaust credits, they've used the antisemitism slur so much they now pretend that they never use it so they do code instead as in "why do you single out the only Jewish state?"
I think the only things hindering the development of a mass campaign against Israel are the demoralisation caused by the democratic deficit where people see popular support for this or that cause being completely ignored by elected governments and the fact that there is now undoubtedly some manifestation of antisemitism in the anti-zionist movement. I think that is deterring some people from getting involved. People who don't fall for the smear still recognise and despise the real thing when it rears its head. I know myself that arguing against it is tiring and a distraction.
But the propaganda would be fantastic. "Those people don't want peace!" "They want to drive us into the sea." "The only thing those people understand is force."
I don't think there'd be war between them, more an armed broiges where lots of people get killed.
Commenting by HaloScan
