I'm not quite sure what your getting at here - in fact, some of your assumptions about spiked-online are actually unfounded.

For example, you say that "it is unfortunate that there is so little in the way of anti-imperialism in spiked-online nowadays of any sort. Granted, they are anxious to put all that in the past." Well, this statement actually says more about you than it does about spiked-online's critique of Western imperialism.

From David Chandler's 'Bosnia: whose state is it anyway?', to O'Neill's article 'Nepal: now that's what I call democratisation', spiked-online's critique of Western imperialism is pretty self-evident to those who want to see it. Or how about O'Neill's article on that new African 'expert' George Clooney? I don't see you moaning about the fact that some Hollywood know-it-all has now become the leading apologist for Western military intervention in Africa.

Opposing Western military intervention in the third world is what genuine anti-imperialists should be doing, spiked-online are doing it, I'm doing it - I don't see any of your anti-imperialism.
Courtney Hamilton | Homepage | 05.24.06 - 11:44 am | #