Weapons of Mass Discussion - TROLLS wll NOT be tolerated. Period.
Well you wouldn't want to jump to any conclusions based on video documentation *Kidding). Can something be repugnant and yet not be technically criminal. I leave that up to your refined ethical sensibilities to tease out and discern an answer... 
I think the fact that I am asking the question makes it clear that I find it distasteful. But this is war, not a picnic in the park...
Abu Grahib was pretty revolting and reflected poorly upon the U.S. The perpetrators stupidly believed that the ends - whatever they thought them to be - justified the means. They have since learned differently.
How - in light of the explosive scandal and the harsh punishment of the perpetrators - any military unit could not comprehend that this was an unacceptable behavior baffles me.
It is disturbing to me that the embedded media representatives understood how inappropriate this was but the members of the military did not.
Enough said...
If the bodies were already decomposing you burn them. As far as I'm concerned f*ck those skinny d*ck b*st*rds. Americans need to at least stop and think about the fact that those people would love to murder you and your children, and not in a humane less than painful way. They don't hesitate to publicaly admit these things. There's a poor 17 year old kid in Afgahanistan right now who has the testicular fortitude to be a ground pounder and put people who hate you away and we all want to sit around and speculate how PC it is to cremate decomposing bodies. Wake-up people.
P.S. Mahatma
I agree with you about Abu Grahib. Those idiots messed up and I think they recieved a harsh punishment. I only wish that they would have punished higher ranking people in the process. However, I don't think that this has anything to do with the incident that is discussed in the artical.
Commenting by HaloScan
