Weapons of Mass Discussion - TROLLS wll NOT be tolerated. Period.
Might have been tempted to vote for you if you hadn't repeatedly banned me for pointing out a factual error in a Mark post...oh well...
Surfer, you weren't banned for that, and you know it.
OK, true, technically, it was for calling you a liar, which I did in fact retract when you clarified that you hadn't been aware that the comparison of deaths in Iraq with deaths in (insert any urban area in America) had been thoroughly debunked about a thousand times all over the internet. If it matters, I again retract the "liar" sobriquet, but I suspect that the real sin was exposing a high degree of intellectual shallowness and carelessness, rather than the word liar.
Surfer, I'll gladly release your ISP's from the list...what are they again?
My only regret is that I have just one vote per day to give to my SOB compadres.
Give me your vote or give your death! 
surfer, calling someone intellectually shallow and careless is just as bad as calling them a liar. Why can't you say, hey, you made a mistake, owned up to it, and moved on? I mean, that is what you want us to do about Bill Clinton Inc, right? Just move on? So let's do that.
A good point, Mark. I should have given you credit for owning up to a mistake. That is rare enough on political blogs of the right or the left these days. A strong point in your favor. Everyone writing about politics will get something wrong, either a fact or a prediction or an analysis. Only a subset of those errors will be admitted. It takes confidence to admit a mistake.
(thanks for removing the bans, Matt)
surfer, now we can fight anew without any further backbiting grudges. Thanks for reading, regardless of your political vent.
Surfer, I'm not real sure which IPs are you...I had to ban a whole bunch of spam bots in the meantime, so I may have missed something...
Commenting by HaloScan
