|
|
|
Ahhh sexual repression and the politics it ignites... lets not forget the myrid of sex crimes it inspires.
I agree. Boobies or willies... whats the big deal? Really, the most dangerous part of the body is the hand and the fingers it comes with. The one that pulls the trigger, stifles a scream, hits in a clenched fist, slaps, pushes a button, etc. What next... gloves?
lecram |
Homepage |
01.04.07 - 5:20 pm | #
|
|
I'm still here.......
What an odd topic for such a furore - a naked chocolate messiah.....??
I have a chocolate bunny who isn't wearing any clothes! 
cq
craziequeen |
Homepage |
01.04.07 - 6:44 pm | #
|
|
I've never been so afronted in my life! I'll never come back here! Even if my google searches for "evil screaming monkey scrotum legos" return an entire page of hits directing me to your undapants. I have half a mind to come to Istanbul and spank you.
rob |
Homepage |
01.04.07 - 11:18 pm | #
|
|
Seems to be a competition going on between small-brained, bigoted Christians and Muslims at the moment. What's the prize? ...feels so damn uncomfortable to be in between these fools.
Cosima |
Homepage |
02.04.07 - 4:37 pm | #
|
|
I couldn't agree more with you! Do we seriously have NOTHING better to worry about with the current state of affairs in the world the way they are?....
Oooh... there is so much more I want to reply to this entry but don't have time to right now as I am getting ready to run off to an appointment... incidentally to see a young person who was raped by those who supposedly love her... We have such a long way to go as a species....
tia |
Homepage |
02.04.07 - 9:54 pm | #
|
|
I never realised they had normal depraved people in Iran. This is encouraging.
I'm a bit like you, I refuse to wear bottoms in the garden, why hide my innocent goolies under a bushel?
rob |
Homepage |
03.04.07 - 1:16 pm | #
|
|
I wasn't going to comment, but somehow felt I must, after all I am a follower of Jesus (a term I often use instead of saying Christian).
First of all, Jesus had all his body parts because he was a man, not because he was made in God's image (God's image applies to men and women and I don't think that's a physical image. This can get into a long debate).
I can see how people are offended by the chocolate figure, personally I'd refuse to give it any publicity as it seems the artist was just trying to get people upset at him so that he could get even more publicity. As for me, I think the artist is tacky and will ignore him.
As for your friend from Iran, who knows what he (or she) was thinking. They may have been upset with blogspot, or they may be looking for something on blogspot. I get a lot of weird hits too, especially after writing about going to a dominatix (the woman who is my dentist)
sage |
Homepage |
05.04.07 - 5:39 am | #
|
|
This uptight, confederate flag waving, pee-pee covering portion of this country (FLORIDA) needs more thinkers like you Keda. You're amazing. I remember a news article a few years ago where the mother-lovin' people of Naples Florida had to COVER the wee-wee of a small statue of the David on display in a rotunda. They suggested a loin cloth. Heaven forbid we actually let our impressionable sons and daughters to see the human form before they're married! Nice post.
bruce |
Homepage |
06.04.07 - 4:34 am | #
|
|
By the way, the most dangerous part of the human body is the tongue. Consider the power of the spoken word?
bruce |
Homepage |
06.04.07 - 4:37 am | #
|
|
Funny enough, tonight, after reading your post, I happened to stumble across this - http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/04/04...tion/
index.html
About XXXChurch . com and Christians admitting to an addiction to porn.
bruce |
Homepage |
06.04.07 - 4:58 am | #
|
|
Bruce, from your state of Florida and from a conservative columnist no less (Kathleen Parker) comes this editorial on the chocolate sculpture:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/
n...,1752520.column
Although I seldom agree with her and her right-wing politics, she uses language cleverly and humorously.
sage |
Homepage |
06.04.07 - 6:50 pm | #
|
|
she wrote quite well yes, but i still find it absolutely comical and ridiculous that there is still such 'objection' to eating jesus when 'christians' eat the body of christ and drink his blood every day in communion.
it just doesn't make sense.
you know spiders and cockroaches and assorted creepy crawlies are HIGHLY objectionable to me. they disgust me. yet i know this is MY problem, not theirs, not whoever or whatever brought them into being. if i and all phobics started making death threats to cameramen and filmmakers who make nature programmes etc we would be rightly laughed at and told to go get therapy.
anyone who is dumb enough to object to this in the way that has been done deserves no less.
my phobia is bloody stupid and ridiculous. i admit it and make fun of myself. yet it remains. that is the healthy path that sane beings take. as long as spiders and creepy crawlies and those darn wil;dlife photographers don't really harm us in the grand scheme of things they should be allowed to go about their business.
on the other hand people who can do real physical and mental damage, like donahue and all the other dangerous evil spirited bastards who insult and endanger women everyday by insulting them if they are abused and mistreated by men and left alone with babies in their bellies or in their homes, i reserve my right to object to.
loudly strongly. because they do real physical harm.
unlike any chocolate jesus ever could!
just saying.
keda |
Homepage |
08.04.07 - 1:55 pm | #
|
|
I shall be singing chocolate Jesus now.
rashbre |
Homepage |
09.04.07 - 11:17 am | #
|
|
Where I come from we say bum, but everyone here says butt and I don't like the word butt the way you don't like ass over arse.
colleen |
Homepage |
12.04.07 - 12:51 am | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|