Stroppyblog
Strappy,
Well I'm glad you thought it worth noting. I think the idea is valid, for me and anyone else who make comments that are more than a line or two.
For example, I engaged in a reasonably lengthy debate on Red Squirrels Lair about Scottish Independence. If you know that blog and go there, fine. If not I wanted somewhere else where I could make my views known (which is what we all do, in part) and where my points could easily be found (not least, by me!).
I'm also sure that I have 'lost' some stuff as I have forgotten where I may have said something or have replies to comments of mine that I never got to see. I'm surprised more people don't do this – although, as I said, I'd love to have it all on one site.
So talking of which, it's hard to search the comments on your blog. Maybe you can remember some more occasions when I have taken a scalpel to your warm and cuddly democratic socialism - let me have a link and I'll be sure to repost the comments.
And for reference, I
’m not so keen on blondes but do have empathy for poor innocents who feel the full brute force of a vicious legal system. Like all socialists should. Even soft ones.
Even ones whose grand daddy paid into the campaign fund and thats why he let her out?
Anyway , she is hardly some poor innocent. She had a driving ban for drink driving (which can kill !) and she ignored it twice and tried to blame her staff . Hmmm, sorry, no sympathy whatsoever.
oh and i'm not that 'warm and cuddy' either !!
Make sure you include both times you've agreed with me in comments on your comment site Punchbowel!
Thank you.
A 'Thank-you' from Will. You start to lose all self-confidence about your politics when he agrees with what you say. You think I must have gone down the wrong route somewhere. Even the 'bowel' seemed half hearted.
For the record we both think that social networking sites have an avalanche of inanities and the Clash would have been liked by the leftist spouters of such inanities.
I much preferred it when we were inviting each other to step outside, not least for the tremendous and lingering damage that the monstrosity that was Militant (and of which he was a member, I believe) did to Marxism in this country.
For every pandering to Labour types, concession to imperialism such as politics on Israel and Ireland don't overlook the fuckers with the fighting fund and the lingering perversion that has on even today's militants - Will and co, chauvinist reformists.
Marvelous stuff Southpaw!
And you two were starting to play nicely as well 
Let's be fair. Generations of revolutionaries have studied the Complete Works of Lenin, to the enormous benefit of the far left.
Why should the revolutionaries of the future be denied access to all that the incisive thought of SouthpawPunch has to offer us?
I will make sure that Daddy's Little Princesses take a good look at SPP Comment, just as soon as they read well enough.
You taking the piss Osler
Now you know it cant be easy being the only real revolutionary , all these Punchie blogs are all for our own good .
Damn Will, maybe you really are a changed man.
I wrote the above in a deliberate over-the-top manner to promote an expected response but you clearly saw straight through my little ruse and rose above it - that, or you're blissed out chanting Hare Krishna or something.
Yes, Stroppy as it happens I was thinking along the same lines.
Maybe Southpawpunch Energy - switch your energy supplier to Southpawpunch and get discounted subscriptions to various left publications and a complete refund of all your energy payments once the utility companies have been expropiated.
Or perhaps Southpawpunch Dating - Are you Billy No Marx? Do women laugh at you when you invite them back to your bedsit to have a look through old copies of Socialist Challenge? Join Southpawpunch Dating to get the details of 3 hot trot women.
Be aware though that, as the left ever shrinks, you may well have expelled your prospective date, already slept with her or she could be your sister.
I could make a sarky remark about how people always get original content on my site as opposed to rewritten copy from the FT (which is clever given the fact you readers only ever buy the Guardian). But I won't, I'll let you think you may have won one.
Punchie
At least you do seem able to take the piss out of yourself Or perhaps you are serious.
I assume the FT comment is directed at Dave not me.
Oh and I don't read the Guardian !
Possibly "Jim Denham Rant Blog", with all of Jim's best rants from other people's sites, along with a poll on what point precisely they'll ban him?
How about Southpawpunchpensions? Bread-and-butter to live off under capitalism, jam tomorrow after the revolution? The SPPEnergy-plan seems to remind me a bit of various anti-nuclear campaigns in the 80s - "reduce your bill by 16% to protest at government subsidies of atomic energy". Did anyone ever get their leccy cut off because of that?
Commenting by HaloScan
