is making profit against Islam too?
Senthil | Homepage | 09.02.06 - 3:05 pm | #

Hey Man, it is their religion,
and whatever it is, in principle it is right,
See the beauty of their religion that it says "..Ismey Sood(interest) Hai, Aur Juan(dicey) Hai,
Sood aur juan se to sab bachna chahtay hain, dont you,

Think, at the inception of Islam it started teaching such a good concept,

Now come to Hinduism where always upper strata of society is cheating and tampering lower strata of society,

Remember Bramhanism, where to ward of any problem you have to give cows, grains, money and all to the priest, ALL IN THE NAME OF RELIGION,

SO THE PROBLEM IS NOT THAT OF ANY RELIGION.

It is that we have changed our way of life ie culture completely AND over that ISLAM is rigid BUT Hinduism is very flexible.

So principles of Hinduism keep on changing and that of Islam dont.

Take an instance of meat eating.

In Hinduism it is not regarded as good and it is completely prohibited for Brahmins BUT animal sacrifices were always and now also the part of Hinduism and the meat of slaughtered animal is eaten.

And the majority of Hindus are meat eaters.

You can find thousands of such instances in Hinduism where parallel things move on and there are followers and proponents for both.

That means since Hinduism is so much flexible, it is not in danger and since ISLAM is not flexible, it is in danger
Anonymous | 09.02.06 - 5:42 pm | #

Who comes up with these bright ideas, anyway?
Sudipta Chatterjee | Homepage | 09.03.06 - 11:51 am | #

In principle it is right, but the given analogy and relevance is pathetic.
Manish | Homepage | 09.04.06 - 11:36 am | #

Does it matter?
Deepak Jeswal | Homepage | 09.05.06 - 1:32 pm | #

I wish to keep away from commenting on the religion itself. Ironically, in good old days the best debt collectors (including the interest)hired by both Hindus and by those who claim to be against “Sood” used to be Kabuli Pathans. These huge sized individuals will go on rounds to periodically collect if not the Mool but definitely the Sood.
Narendra Tandon | 09.05.06 - 9:01 pm | #

India should have been a theocratic state - just like Pakistan.
The Thief | 09.05.06 - 10:23 pm | #

If India were a theocratic state, there would have been no issues at all.

It was a mistakes leaders did in 1947
The Thief | 09.05.06 - 10:24 pm | #

Manish, I am glan there is till now no nazi-secularists in your comment box.
Alka | Homepage | 09.06.06 - 7:11 am | #

Fatwas don't matter, but they just irritate!

What a irony, Uncle!

At least the good thing was they created a new Pakistan! Imagine what would have been our situation otherwise!

Alka, they keep away from me
Anonymous | 09.06.06 - 11:43 am | #

That anonymous was me!
Manish | Homepage | 09.06.06 - 11:44 am | #

Yes the communists avoid this blogsite !!!
The Thief | 09.06.06 - 2:44 pm | #

Communists, Rightists, Liberals, all avoid this blog
Manish | Homepage | 09.08.06 - 11:35 am | #