|
|
|
The reason this story is re-emerging is because people are now more than ever disgusted by child predators and we, unfortunately, are perhaps paying more attention to the issue now than we did in the early 1990's and people are taking a second look at this issue--and taking a second look at the Congresswoman and her husband.
s'up |
10.20.06 - 8:59 am | #
|
|
S'up, I don't say this often, but that is one of the dumbest things I've ever read. The McMartin pre-school scandals more than 20 years ago had people disgusted. The pedofile priests scandals had people disgusted. People digusted and repulsed by child predators is not new.
However, go back and read the comments and posts no one thinks this was a case of a child predator. It has been investigated and scrutinized thoroughly.
This is an attempt to slime a great woman, and a great family. All it does is demonstrate why Patricia Madrid is not fit to represent us in Congress.
Mario Burgos |
Homepage |
10.20.06 - 9:40 am | #
|
|
So... is it just that it's the ONLY thing of even slightly dubious nature that can be made anything of or what?
Patricia Madrid dismisses charges of child sexual abuse because there's no one in the state without a conflict of interest including her, we hear about casino monkey-business and probable pay-offs, and she ignores criminal activity and then prosecutes the Federal witnesses...
And Healther Wilson moved a file? Didn't alter it, didn't destroy it, probably didn't even look in it, it was never lost and is right where it's supposed to be today.
Synova |
Homepage |
10.20.06 - 6:33 pm | #
|
|
Commenting by HaloScan
|