Thanks for Commenting
You really have to laugh at the irony of the press conference.
You have two rich white people complaining that other rich white people are ignoring the improvised hispanic people. As a hispanic, I don't need any help from rich white people.
At least they; Diane and Al could have had a hispanic at the press conference to make it look legit.
They weren't talking about Hispanics; they were talking about poor people in general.
This whole blog post is really a stretch at "Democrats attacking a pueblo." And pitting races against each other, give me a break. That is outrageous.
Putting the word "victory" in front of every newly hired helper in the republican party is not going to help you all win in November.
Especially hiring Fiorina, who was ousted from her CEO job at HP mainly due to the fact that she illegally spied on her employees and co workers there. Mirror image of the Republican party if you ask me.
Quoting from the GOP's linked article in the blog,
"She has advised the Departments of Defense...and the CIA"
On what was she advising them? How best to spy on the American people without any authorization or warrants?
GOP really knows how to pick them. Maybe she can help them recover the money from the corrupt treasurer at the RCCC who stole thousands of dollars from the "grassroots" of your party.
Yeah Mario... but being a Republican you can't possibly be a real Hispanic. Kind of like Condoleeza can't really be Black. She can only be Oreo. Maybe you can only be an Oreo Hispanic.
Skab, the only people saying that CON-doleeza Rice isn't what she says she is are the people of your party. Like Redstate.com or whatever.
The minute she says she appreciates the speech Obama gave on race you all drop her like a hot potato. Last year it was " Condi in '08" Now its you all want nothing to do with her because she actualy mentioned something about race.
Mario is going to be in a very tiny minority in the republican party because of their racist terms. You all wonder why minorities run from your paty. Its because you treat them like second class citizens. Maybe not you personally, but through the policies of your party.
Example,
The front page story on Dailykos.com . You dont have to like the website to look at the sources and video they have on John McCain talking about Martin Luther King Jr. Talk about a person trying to get the support of African Americans and Any American with a brain atop their shoulders for that matter. Heres the link: Im not sure how to inbed a link into my post so it will have to be copied and pasted:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/20...599/1013/
490200
Oh it does the link it automatically.
Whoa... who is this blog poster 'JD'?
A Glass House Democrat?
Fascinating reference to a corrupt treasurer? Er JD, who was Robert Vigil? Oh I know! He was a victim of a witch hunt who only just happened to become a self made millionair while treasurer of New Mexico. Hysterical, simply facking hysterical.
McCain really seems to be focusing on New Mexico for some reason.
Another ironic fact:
James Jimenez, Governor Richardson Chief of Staff, hosted the national association of state budget officers at the tamaya resort last june. Why hasn't Light Governor Denise and Al Park complained about that conference.
Two years ago the Republican party got it's collected butts beat because of a scandel with a Republican lobbyist and Indian casinos. We all know the investigation played a part in the Republican defeats in 06'. It is rather hillarous that they decided to hold their convention at an Indian Resort. Nice reminder on their part. I am guessing another tough year for the Republicans.
It is a funny thing about Indian [sic] Casinos and Republican lobbyist. I don't like Casinos and I don't like the Republicans that supported their initialization. I consider Casinos to be a capitulation to this something for nothing mentality. In my mind that would have been better left to the Dems. But as I recall, when that Casino ball was in the Democrats court all the Indians got were promises. It was Johnson that actually delivered. So it was kind of a mixed bag. If I could claim a bright side I would say "at least he delivered".
I didn't vote for Johnson. Don't remember who he was running against or if that was back before the Democrats had turned Communist. I might even have been a Dem back then.
Hysterical? Not really. Glass house Democrats are what is hysterical.
Actually, I was referring to the national problem the Jack Abramoff scandal caused since this was the Republican National Committee in town.
This was nothing wrong with them going to Santa Ana, I just notice the irony of them planning for victory in 08' while putting themselves in the shadow of 06'.
"There was"
Yeah, the Abramof scandal is the trump card of scandals. Everything after that is more or less cracker crumbs.
What I always thought was wierd was when Comrade Richardson claimed he was doing an honorable thing when he cashed in his 300 thousand in Valero stock options. His claim to honorable... he was divesting himself so there would never be any possible conflict of interest.
But the unasked question will always be. How did he get that 300k in the first place without there ever being any conflict of interest? I mean, he has been in politics essentially all of his adult life. Ostensibly he sat on the board... so has does that argument work? He was "working" for Valero at the same time he was "working" for us taxpayers? A little double dipping so to speak? And what benefit exactly was it that Valero received from having Richardson on the board... decision making prowess? Or was his position purely "nominal". You know, like when Richardson was on the board for Peregrin... getting paid for "nominal" while Peregrin was getting "cleaned out".
But hey that's only cracker crumbs. And really not even the stuff of good scandal because Comrade Journalist didn't find it particularly interesting.
For all that Abramoff was a good catch. But I do believe Comrade Jounalist is likely to take his gloves off when ideologically convenient. I guess that is to be expected.
But it still seems to me that these sanctimonious Democrate either live in houses without mirrors... or in secret, they actually worship corruption.
It seems to me that every democrat you keep bringing up is conservative.
It seems that the only consistent thing between all these scandals is CONSERVATIVE politicians.
Richardson may be a democrat, but he is certainly not on the left side of the spectrum. I know. Im way over here on the left and I don't see him anywhere.
The conservative ideology is based solely on personal gain so what makes you think elected conservatives would forget the basis of their ideology, and wouldnt use their offices to gain personally.
Commenting by HaloScan
