Mario,

Didn't an anonymous commenter on one of your earlier posts say something about the Senator and Congresswoman supporting your opponent? Rumor, innuendo, and the death of pseudo-celebrities are a much more compelling read, than real facts and debate based on facts. Which are VERY titillating to me. But, thats just me.
David Jacobs | 03.21.07 - 3:06 pm | #

Excellent post, Mario; you are absolutely right about Monahan's lies, and his efforts to do whatever he can to create dissension in the Republican Party. He IS a blogger for the left, and it is clear in everything he ever writes.
Anonymous | 03.21.07 - 4:16 pm | #

Sour grapes, Mario?
Anonymous | 03.22.07 - 3:22 pm | #

What? How is that sour grapes?

Mario, as a LINO (like a RINO but with an "L") I couldn't vote for you, sorry about that. I'm happy to help in other ways, though. I can't see things getting to the point where I'd vote *my* party next election so I'll probably be pushing for Republicans again.
Synova | Homepage | 03.22.07 - 5:58 pm | #

Sour grapes? I don't get it.
Mario Burgos | Homepage | 03.22.07 - 8:08 pm | #

When I read the Monahan post, I too was wondering if Joe has gone off the deep end.

On one hand, Heather and Pete, according to Monahan, removed a U S Attorney. On the other hand, Heather and Pete, according to Monahan, couldn't remove a county chairman.

Does not make an sense.
John Chavez | 03.23.07 - 7:05 pm | #

Fernando C de Baca would have lost the County Chair election if Pete and Heather would have backed a better candidate. Seems like their boy was a little green (and I don't mean chile) for the post.
Gus O'Riley | 03.24.07 - 6:42 pm | #