Thanks for Commenting
Why are you pretending that Heinrich was implying that White somehow influenced Bush's policy when he's clearly saying that White *agrees* with Bush's policy and is unlikely to advocate something else if elected?
Dan, I don't think that is what "he's clearly saying." You can't have your cake and eat it too on this one. Even if we agree to disagree on the intent of the commercial, you have to admit it is REALLY cheesy.
I agree that its very cheesy, but not nearly as cheesy as the entire persona of Darren White. I mean, dude didn't even get rid of his mullet until he decided to run for congress.
Not true. I'm pretty sure Darren got rid of the mullet at the turn of the millennium. However, please don't take my word for it, I encourage you to call the campaign and ask.
Or better yet, you can ask that question be included in the upcoming televised debate between Darren White and Martin Heinrich...
Oops, never mind, I just learned it's confirmed that Martin Heinrich is afraid to debate the "persona of Darren White."
Hmm, kind of makes you rethink that whole substance argument, doesn't it?
By now I'm sure you've been informed of it Mario but Darren White has committed to and then not shown up to many, many more forums than Heinrich. Hypocrisy? From the GOP? I am shocked! Shocked!
I'm still waiting for your expose on why Darren's commercials had to use reserve deputies after the actual full time deputies refused to be in them. (I'll give you a hint, its because none of them support him.)
Commenting by HaloScan
