The way that supposedly "scientific" studies have been hijacked by vested interests was worrying and has certainly made me more sceptical, however, the actual scientific content of the program was negligible in my view as I covered in this
http://www.xoggoth.org/pages/
blo...ggoth.html#c4gw
Cannot lay my hands on links at the mo (will be commenting on my blog when I have the time) but of the two points I did find convincing, it turns out that one, the idea that volcanoes produce more CO2 than man, is not even remotely correct. Also one of the scientists on the program has objected to very selective use of his comments.
What do you expect of The Independent?(spit?) Try New Scientist. Also found thes, not realy looked in detail.
http://volcano.und.edu/vwdocs/Ga.../Gases/
man.html
http://fermiparadox.wordpress.co...3/10/swindlers/
http://www.realclimate.org/damon...n&
laut_2004.pdf
You ought dip deeper. I've found plenty of evidency that while some facts are correct, there is a lot of controversy around it.
The biggest problem with having any form of rational debate about "Climate Change" is that for many people it has become a religion, with all the terminology, ad-hominem and bigotry thereby implied.
Commenting by HaloScan
