I liked that Robin's costume looked like Nightwing's from the comic. And that's all I got.

TNT shows this movie CONSTANTLY, Mike, in case you feel the need for further study.


Batgirl wasn't allowed to punch Poison Ivy. I'm pretty sure that was the doubleplus final straw for me.

OH NO: "Chicks like you give women a bad name!"

They gave that man an OSCARRR.

//Oo/\


"And there our three heroes run off triumphantly into no future sequels."

Made me lol.

I also love the fact that the bat credit card says "Thru: FOREVER" on it.


so, is that a recommendation for others to see the film? I still haven't seen it, so since you didn't seem to do yourself r=the bodily harm you anticipated...


The Rifftrax is one of their worst since it's the one that is fan written. I'm a completist so I have it but I wouldn't recommend anyone going out of their way for it.

And I have to disagree with you a bit on how those sets. Everything looked polystyrene and neon to me. The film looked like it was made in the mid-eighties not the late nineties.


Roger, you've got to see it just to be able to complain about it knowledgeably. It's like reading All-Star Batman and Robin. :P


"It's a Bat-Bomb!" "Truer words were never spoken!"

I actually own the two-disc version of this, but in my defense I will note that it was part of a box set, and the second disc has the concluding part of an actually decent documentary on Da Bat (it also connects up to the DVD release of Batman Begins.)

General opinion is that Shumacher's commentary tracks for Forever and B&R should consist of a lot of whipping, moaning, and crying of Mea Culpa! and various flavors of apology. Listening to them, he's actually kind of proud of the films.

George Clooney, on the other hand, has been justifiably in mortal torment about B&R since it was released. The shaaaammmmeeee!


I actually enjoyed this movie! And the trailer got me really pumped up about it 11 years ago. Ah, good, innocent schoolboy days of yore.

But looking back at it today... man, Joel Schumacher really fucked up the Bat-franchise.


I know I'm a lone voice in the wilderness on this, but as bad as Batman and Robin was, I feel Batman Forever was far, far worse. Kilmer is worse than Clooney, Two-Face is criminally wasted, Jim Carrey is infinitely worse than any in B&R, Nicole Kidman is soul-searingly bad and makes Jezebel Jett look like a good relationship...

But it's probably just me...


GAH!
My eyes!

I just tried watching that little 9-minute clip fest at the bottom there and could NOT make it past 3 minutes or so.

Joel Shumacker suxx so much that even in the Batman ANIMATED series, they made fun of him!
One episode, where they have three kids telling three different POV tales of BatMan, one of the kids names is JOEL and he's portrayed as effete (with a feather boa in one scene) and the other kids are all like; "Yeah Joel. Sure. You don't know ANYTHING about BatMan."

All the Shumacker films sucked ass.
For some reason he insisted on destroying oerfectly good villains.

Poison Ivy couldn't have been LESS sexy in this if she tried.

The Animated MR FREEZE is still the best incarnation.
(PLEASE tell me how a guy who is completely frozen inside can INHALE HOT CIGAR SMOKE and NOT CRACK OPEN?!?")

And in the last film Two-Face was more Joker than Two-Face.
Riddler was OK, but only because Jim Carey pulled it off fairly well.

Ugh.
The best BatMan movie from the first franchise (in my humble opinion) was the 2nd (with Penguin & Catwoman).

Otherwise, I'd like to forget any of them ever happened.

X_the_Phantom-Longbox__


One thing I realized years ago about 'Batman Forever' and 'Batman and Robin' is that Akiva Goldsman wrote virtually the same movie plot twice, just switching out characters.

At the time I wrote Batman & Robin Forever, describing both movies' plots with a single summary.


I read the post all the way through, Mike I had to because I couldn't believe you would subject yourself to it.

The only time a letter of mine has been published in a film magazine was my vitriolic diatribe about Batman and Robin, a fact of which I am proud. It was so bad that, even though I had seen the film in the cinema for free (I won some tickets), I still wanted my money back.

I salute you for your bravery just so you could have content for you blog.


Batman and Robin is indescribably bad. Even John Glover couldn't raise my spirits by offering a Swamp Thing connection. When I saw the film in the theater, and when we got to the part with Bane walking around uttering "Bomb! Bomb! Bomb!" someone in the audience yelled out, "Jesus, even BANE realizes this film sucks!" Clooney, who most looks the part as Bruce Wayne, gave the worst perfomance as the Batman--ever. Silverstone was hot in her rubber fetish costume...but her character was ridiculous. Uma Thurman was embarrassingly non-sexy and utterly non-convincing. Pat Hingle turned Gordon into a Keystone Cop. Arnie was so wrongly cast as Freeze that it defies logic, and his character was about as un-Freeze-like as it gets without having Adam West playing Batman. The incessant cold jokes were an abomination--and not of the snowman kind...just abominable, period. The neon Gotham City was like battery acid in my eyes. And the Bat credit card immediately made me ask my friend a simple question: "Where do they send the bill each month?" Oh, Joel...why?


i saw in the film in the theater, and as it unspooled i started sinking further and further into my seat. i kept telling myself "it'll get better" in that desperate Homer Simpson voice.

but when Bats whipped out the Bat Credit Card, i thought "they could bring out the entire Justice League after this and the movie would still suck."

Mike, you spent more time thinking about this movie than the screenwriters did. and (presumably) without blow. congratulations!


I abhor both Schumacher "Batman" films. I still love the two Burton films, though, especially the second one. I still get a tinge of regret every once in awhile that he (Burton) was never allowed to make a third one. Assuming he would have had the same basic requisites as Schumacher did, I would have loved to have seen his take on Robin, Two-Face (with Billy Dee Williams playing the part), and the Riddler. It also may have saved him from making "Mars Attacks," the only truly awful film he ever made.

Oh well.


All things said and done, throw in a glam rock soundtrack and you'd have yourself a great Ken Russell film. If I can look at it through that filter, I have to admit I kind of dig it.


You know, I saw this one in the theaters on opening day and I loved it. Not because it was any good, but because it was so bad it was hilarious. My buddies and I laughed throughout the movie, laughed for a few hours at the waffle house after the movie, and laughed all the way home. So worth every penny.

Dunno if they fixed it on DVD, but there's one fight scene in the middle there where Robin gets dragged underwater by a vine. In the middle of the sequence there's a brief shot of him trying to resurface only to get dragged under - but all they did was run the footage of him finally re-emerging and then reverse it really fast. It was so cheesy and completely obvious that we can't believe they let that one slip through.


Mike, you are a true man of steel. I couldn't get through the YouTube clip so there's no way I'm watching this movie. I usually love silly Batman stuff like the 60's show and Bat-Mite, but this stuff just makes my brain scream in pain.


I got to 4:46 on the clip and couldn't get past it, but partially because I was forced to see bits of this travesty recently when I appeased my step-son, whom we judged too young to see Dark Knight, by finding copies of the 4 90's Bat-films to watch.

Looking back, I think subjecting him to this did far greater damage.

Sorry, kid!


I remember not too long after this came out reading an interview with Mike Nelson from MST3K and he referred to it as not only the worst movie ever, but the worst thing ever. That always stuck with me.

That is all.


I still stand by my belief that if this was released in 1968 and starred Adam West and Burt Ward it would be the best Batman film EVER.

That said, it's very funny to see how humorously disparaging Clooney is about it. He knows he was in a turkey and he gleefully admits it.


What, all that commentary, and not a single mention of when Clooney Batman does the whole "Fred Flintstone Sliding Down the Bronto's Neck, Back and Tail at the Beginning of the Flintstones" thing?

I mean, when I saw that, I knew the movie was just going to get progressively worse and worse... heck, that was the reason I waited to see "Batman Begins" until long after it had been out on DVD, because I just didn't trust Warner's with their DC franchises any longer (well, that plus I saw "Superman Returns").


I can honestly say I have never seen a worse movie in the theatre. I paid over $10 Cdn to see it, too.

I'm a little embarrassed to admit I laughed uproariously at the Bat Visa, though.


I've seen maybe the first 10 minutes of this film, and couldn't take any more.

That said, "Batman Returns" and "Batman Forever" are pretty awful, too.


I think Batman Forever is worse than this.


I think your final comments are on the nose- the problem isn't that it's campy but that it fails at being effectively so. One thing I noticed was how stage-like the sets are- the lighting and the way they're built makes it too obvious that these aren't real places, there's no sense of an overall environment. Everyone plays it too broad (I LIKE Uma Thurman, but she really embarrasses herself here.)

And that overacting reporter woman is Bob Kane's wife, so that's how that happened.


Sterling, you totally ripped off my post from last week! J'accuse!

http://spatulaforum.blogspot.com...-robin- and.html

And yet, you actually had the stones to watch the film, so you win. Again. Respec.


Joel Shumacker suxx so much that even in the Batman ANIMATED series, they made fun of him!
One episode, where they have three kids telling three different POV tales of BatMan, one of the kids names is JOEL and he's portrayed as effete (with a feather boa in one scene) and the other kids are all like; "Yeah Joel. Sure. You don't know ANYTHING about BatMan."


That scene has always struck me as needlessly mean-spirited, and just over the line into outright homophobia. It was completely out of place in a show that was supposedly aimed at children.


I agree, Dorian. A swipe at Shumacker is fine, but the gay-bashing in that scene was totally uncalled for, especially because it tarnishes what is otherwise one of the best episodes in the animated series.


To the previous commentator: Mars Attacks is not Tim Burton's worst film, it's actually his best, and once you realize that you will see why Tim Burton totally lost the plot after that movie and Ed Wood. What is there you can possibly say after those two great films? I still haven't washed the taste of Big Fish out of my mouth, and I haven't bothered with anything since.

I'm still a little surprised this film hasn't become more popular with fans of bad films. Is it possible that it crosses the line from so-bad-it's-good into so-bad-it's-simply-unwatchable? I remember enjoying it quite a bit. (But then, I'm probably inclined to be more charitable towards Shumacher - he made a great film called Tigerland a few years back which approximately no one else saw but is worth tracking down if you don't believe the man could ever direct anything worth a damn.)


(I should probably mention, parenthetically to my previous parenthesis, that Tigerland was still over-the-top and kind of trashy, but he somehow managed to make the tone fit a bit better with a hyper-macho and intentionally homoerotic Vietnam war film than with Batman.)


I love watching the scenes with the Gotham gangs.. I just figure that any minute they're going to start snapping and dancing around each other like West Side Story. And the neon colors.. Without a doubt, Gotham has the most FABULOUS gangs evah!


Thirty-two responses? Mike, is that a record for your blog? I don't ever remember seeing that many before, but I could be wrong.


I had similarly avoided Batman & Robin for years until it popped up on cable a few months back. Don't know if I could have watched it without distractions, but it was fine accompaniment to a few hours of admin work over at comicbookdb. I was able to enjoy it for how bad it was, but I am convinced that I would have found it soul-crushing to watch when it came out given how much I loved the two Burton-helmed Bat-flicks.

"00:03:16 - Oh, so they're gonna go with the "Sick Alfred" subplot, are they? "Okay, now pretend to feel sick." "Sure, let me just picture the script in my mind...."

I like to think of this moment as a brief bit of meta-commentary, as though after the gratuitous ass shots of the 'gettin' suited up' scene, even Alfred knows how bad the film is going to be. Either that, or he is sighing about Bruce & Dick being such flouncy fashion-plates.


When anyone tries to tell me that longtime NYT movie reviewer Janet Maslin deserved to be taken seriously at all, I point them to the review of this movie.


There is one thing that made Batman and Robin wonderful. It killed the comic movie franchise for a couple of years and made Hollywood take a long and serious look about how comic movies should NOT be made. Without Batman and Robin Warner Brothers would have never gone on to make Batman Begins or The Dark Knight. From what I remember reading Warner Brothers was happy to continue on with the series casting Madonna as a Harley Quinn. Oh dear Buddha the madness that would have continued if not for Batman and Robin being so horrible. So it can be said that in being the abomination Batman and Robin essentially saved the comic book movie genre(except for Spider-Man 3 and X-Men 3). And gave all of us a great laugh, cringe, and sigh along the way.


I still think Batman Forever was worse. What with Jim Carrey over acting the f**k out of his totally off base riddler, through to Billy Dee Williams becoming Tommy Lee Jones (who is soooo miscast). On top of stupid stupid stupid dialogue for Robin (I can't begin to tell you how many people groaned at the Holy Heavy Metal line in the cinema)

WORST. BATMAN. EVER.


Watching the YouTube clip, I notice that everyone seems to be 10+ stories in the air half the time. Cars jumping off of statues, Bane dropping down from Arkham Asylum, etc. Kind of weird.

It does seem like they were trying to capture the same campy style of the 60's TV show, albeit with higher production values. This obviously did not work.

Finally, did Chris O'Donnell and Alicia Silverstone just disappear after this was made? I don't remember ever hearing their names mentioned again relating to cinema.


Silverstone gradually faded from sight, but O'Donnell's been around and doing regular stints in film and television. He's never made it to serious star level, but he's done well for himself.


I actually think Schwarzenegger gets something of a bum rap for this movie... if only because I can't imagine *anyone* doing much with the abominable material they give his character.

An interview quote from Uma Thurman tells my everything I need to know about the making of this movie. According to her, Joel Schumacher told her "Forget everything you learned in acting school - this is a comic book movie!"

Mission accomplished, Uma!


Mr Freeze lines that didn't make it into the movie.

"I'm hungry, lets have some chili."
"I'm freezed to meet you."
"You might say Batman and I are polar opposites"
"Don't like the temperature in my hideout? Are you some sort of brrrly-man?"

etc, ad nauseum...

Still, it was better than Batman Forever.


And better than Superman Returns.


Your comments about the similarities between B&R and the Adam West show (and where it all falls apart on them) are pretty much exactly what I thought when the two-disc set came out a while back.

When I watched it in the theatre, I was actually physically sick. I was ten at the time, so the two years I spent waiting for the movie was, like, a fifth of my life! In retrospect, I can see what they were trying to do, but they just weren't creative and funny enough to pull it off.

The Alfred scenes really aren't that bad, though.


Just to prove that I actually read it all, I'll nitpick (my most cherished mode of communication):

So what where these henchmen doing why Mr. Freeze was in Arkham?

You meant while, of course.

EDIT: - Yeah, something like that. I'll fix it eventually! --M.


What everyone is forgetting, is that BATMAN FOREVER and BATMAN AND ROBIN
were actually intended to be prequels, taking place just before the 1960's Batman series.
No doubt, Barbara Wilson's untold fate, before the series began, was probably the reason behind the invention of the fabled Bat-Shark-Repellant.

Also, the Halle Berry CATWOMAN film finally gave us a origin for Eartha Kitt's Catwoman...


Trying to vindicate BATMAN & ROBIN with TIGERLAND ?

That's like trying to vindicate ALL STAR BATMAN AND ROBIN with BATMAN : THE DARK KNIGHT strikes again. lol


I remember my wife telling me that my kids watched this when they were staying over at my in-laws' place, one time. They came back pretty jazzed and talking about how much they loved it. After seeing the expression of incredulity on my face she reminded me that they (my kids) were, like, four, six, & eight years old. After that, I always just assumed that was probably the target audience for this movie.

I am dying to hear the audio commentary for it, though.


Name:

Email:

URL:

Comment:  ?

 

Commenting by HaloScan.com